Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacopo Iollo
dblp:368/6810
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 58% Generative modeling · 29% Optimization for machine learning · 13% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design
bayesian experimental design |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive Diffusions · ICLR 2025 PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive design · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive Diffusions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive Diffusions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › experimental design › bayesian experimental design
expected information gain |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive Diffusions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive design · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive design · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive design · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
langevin dynamics · 0.9contrastive diffusion · 0.9bi-level optimization · 0.9tempering · 0.8stochastic optimization · 0.8sequential monte carlo · 0.8contrastive estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive DiffusionsabstractBayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) is a powerful tool to reduce the cost of running a sequence of experiments.
When based on the Expected Information Gain (EIG), design optimization corresponds to the maximization of some intractable expected *contrast* between prior and posterior distributions.
Scaling this maximization to high dimensional and complex settings has been an issue due to BOED inherent computational complexity.
In this work, we introduce an *pooled posterior* distribution with cost-effective sampling properties and provide a tractable access to the EIG contrast maximization via a new EIG gradient expression. Diffusion-based samplers are used to compute the dynamics of the pooled posterior and ideas from bi-level optimization are leveraged to derive an efficient joint sampling-optimization loop, without resorting to lower bound approximations of the EIG. The resulting efficiency gain allows to extend BOED to the well-tested generative capabilities of diffusion models.
By incorporating generative models into the BOED framework, we expand its scope and its use in scenarios that were previously impractical. Numerical experiments and comparison with state-of-the-art methods show the potential of the approach. Jacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence Forbes |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive designabstractWe propose a new procedure named PASOA, for Bayesian experimental design, that performs sequential design optimization by simultaneously providing accurate estimates of successive posterior distributions for parameter inference. The sequential design process is carried out via a contrastive estimation principle, using stochastic optimization and Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) samplers to maximise the Expected Information Gain (EIG). As larger information gains are obtained for larger distances between successive posterior distributions, this EIG objective may worsen classical SMC performance. To handle this issue, tempering is proposed to have both a large information gain and an accurate SMC sampling, that we show is crucial for performance. This novel combination of stochastic optimization and tempered SMC allows to jointly handle design optimization and parameter inference. We provide a proof that the obtained optimal design estimators benefit from some consistency property. Numerical experiments confirm the potential of the approach, which outperforms other recent existing procedures. Jacopo Iollo, Christophe Heinkelé, Pierre Alliez, Florence Forbes |
ICML | 1 |