Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonas A. Erbesdobler
dblp:368/6880
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
smoothed particle hydrodynamics |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid Dynamics · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smoothed particle hydrodynamics solver · 0.8graph neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Neural SPH: Improved Neural Modeling of Lagrangian Fluid DynamicsabstractSmoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) is omnipresent in modern engineering and scientific disciplines. SPH is a class of Lagrangian schemes that discretize fluid dynamics via finite material points that are tracked through the evolving velocity field. Due to the particle-like nature of the simulation, graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as appealing and successful surrogates. However, the practical utility of such GNN-based simulators relies on their ability to faithfully model physics, providing accurate and stable predictions over long time horizons - which is a notoriously hard problem. In this work, we identify particle clustering originating from tensile instabilities as one of the primary pitfalls. Based on these insights, we enhance both training and rollout inference of state-of-the-art GNN-based simulators with varying components from standard SPH solvers, including pressure, viscous, and external force components. All Neural SPH-enhanced simulators achieve better performance than the baseline GNNs, often by orders of magnitude in terms of rollout error, allowing for significantly longer rollouts and significantly better physics modeling. Code available under https://github.com/tumaer/neuralsph. Artur P. Toshev, Jonas A. Erbesdobler, Nikolaus A. Adams, Johannes Brandstetter |
ICML | 2 |