Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thijs Niesten

dblp:368/7561 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-1658-3110ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot navigation and mapping · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
hierarchical model predictive control
0.912025
Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation
0.912025
Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.912025
Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance
0.912025
Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nonlinear MPC · 0.9embedded optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation
abstract
To efficiently deploy robotic systems in society, mobile robots must move autonomously and safely through complex environments. Nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) methods provide a natural way to find a dynamically feasible trajectory through the environment without colliding with nearby obstacles. However, the limited computation power available on typical embedded robotic systems, such as quadrotors, poses a challenge to running MPC in real time, including its most expensive tasks: constraints generation and optimization. To address this problem, we propose a novel hierarchical MPC scheme that consists of a planning and a tracking layer. The planner constructs a trajectory with a long prediction horizon at a slow rate, while the tracker ensures trajectory tracking at a relatively fast rate. We prove that the proposed framework avoids collisions and is recursively feasible. Furthermore, we demonstrate its effectiveness in simulations and lab experiments with a quadrotor that needs to reach a goal position in a complex static environment. The code is efficiently implemented on the quadrotor's embedded computer to ensure real-time feasibility. Compared to a state-of-the-art single-layer MPC formulation, this allows us to increase the planning horizon by a factor of 5, which results in significantly better performance.
Dennis Benders, Johannes Köhler 0001, Thijs Niesten, Robert Babuska, Javier Alonso-Mora, Laura Ferranti
IEEE Trans. Robotics3
2024 DART: A Compact Platform for Autonomous Driving Research∗
abstract
This paper presents the design of a research platform for autonomous driving applications, the Delft’s Autonomous-driving Robotic Testbed (DART). Our goal was to design a small-scale car-like robot equipped with all the hardware needed for on-board navigation and control while keeping it cost-effective and easy to replicate. To develop DART, we built on an existing off-the-shelf model and augmented its sensor suite to improve its capabilities for control and motion planning tasks. We detail the hardware setup and the system identification challenges to derive the vehicle’s models. Furthermore, we present some use cases where we used DART to test different motion planning applications to show the versatility of the platform. Finally, we provide a git repository with all the details to replicate DART, complete with a simulation environment and the data used for system identification.
Lorenzo Lyons, Thijs Niesten, Laura Ferranti
IV2