Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thijs Niesten
dblp:368/7561
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-1658-3110ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot navigation and mapping · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
hierarchical model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonlinear MPC · 0.9embedded optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Embedded Hierarchical MPC for Autonomous NavigationabstractTo efficiently deploy robotic systems in society, mobile robots must move autonomously and safely through complex environments. Nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) methods provide a natural way to find a dynamically feasible trajectory through the environment without colliding with nearby obstacles. However, the limited computation power available on typical embedded robotic systems, such as quadrotors, poses a challenge to running MPC in real time, including its most expensive tasks: constraints generation and optimization. To address this problem, we propose a novel hierarchical MPC scheme that consists of a planning and a tracking layer. The planner constructs a trajectory with a long prediction horizon at a slow rate, while the tracker ensures trajectory tracking at a relatively fast rate. We prove that the proposed framework avoids collisions and is recursively feasible. Furthermore, we demonstrate its effectiveness in simulations and lab experiments with a quadrotor that needs to reach a goal position in a complex static environment. The code is efficiently implemented on the quadrotor's embedded computer to ensure real-time feasibility. Compared to a state-of-the-art single-layer MPC formulation, this allows us to increase the planning horizon by a factor of 5, which results in significantly better performance. Dennis Benders, Johannes Köhler 0001, Thijs Niesten, Robert Babuska, Javier Alonso-Mora, Laura Ferranti |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |
| 2024 | DART: A Compact Platform for Autonomous Driving Research∗abstractThis paper presents the design of a research platform for autonomous driving applications, the Delft’s Autonomous-driving Robotic Testbed (DART). Our goal was to design a small-scale car-like robot equipped with all the hardware needed for on-board navigation and control while keeping it cost-effective and easy to replicate. To develop DART, we built on an existing off-the-shelf model and augmented its sensor suite to improve its capabilities for control and motion planning tasks. We detail the hardware setup and the system identification challenges to derive the vehicle’s models. Furthermore, we present some use cases where we used DART to test different motion planning applications to show the versatility of the platform. Finally, we provide a git repository with all the details to replicate DART, complete with a simulation environment and the data used for system identification. Lorenzo Lyons, Thijs Niesten, Laura Ferranti |
IV | 2 |