Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alaa Anani

dblp:368/7744 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 90% Segmentation and scene understanding · 10%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
1.622025
Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025
Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing
1.622025
Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025
Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.622025
Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025
Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods
0.912025
Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
0.812024
Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

randomized smoothing · 1.6segmentation · 0.9hierarchical classification · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing
abstract
Post-hoc attribution methods aim to explain deep learning predictions by highlighting influential input pixels. However, these explanations are highly non-robust: small, imperceptible input perturbations can drastically alter the attribution map while maintaining the same prediction. This vulnerability undermines their trustworthiness and calls for rigorous robustness guarantees of pixel-level attribution scores. We introduce the first certification framework that guarantees pixel-level robustness for any black-box attribution method using randomized smoothing. By sparsifying and smoothing attribution maps, we reformulate the task as a segmentation problem and certify each pixel’s importance against $\ell_2$-bounded perturbations. We further propose three evaluation metrics to assess certified robustness, localization, and faithfulness. An extensive evaluation of 12 attribution methods across 5 ImageNet models shows that our certified attributions are robust, interpretable, and faithful, enabling reliable use in downstream tasks. Our code is at https://github.com/AlaaAnani/certified-attributions.
Alaa Anani, Tobias Lorenz 0002, Mario Fritz, Bernt Schiele
ICML1
2024 Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing
abstract
Certification for machine learning is proving that no adversarial sample can evade a model within a range under certain conditions, a necessity for safety-critical domains. Common certification methods for segmentation use a flat set of fine-grained classes, leading to high abstain rates due to model uncertainty across many classes. We propose a novel, more practical setting, which certifies pixels within a multi-level hierarchy, and adaptively relaxes the certification to a coarser level for unstable components classic methods would abstain from, effectively lowering the abstain rate whilst providing more certified semantically meaningful information. We mathematically formulate the problem setup, introduce an adaptive hierarchical certification algorithm and prove the correctness of its guarantees. Since certified accuracy does not take the loss of information into account for coarser classes, we introduce the Certified Information Gain ($\mathrm{CIG}$) metric, which is proportional to the class granularity level. Our extensive experiments on the datasets Cityscapes, PASCAL-Context, ACDC and COCO-Stuff demonstrate that our adaptive algorithm achieves a higher $\mathrm{CIG}$ and lower abstain rate compared to the current state-of-the-art certification method. Our code can be found here: [https://github.com/AlaaAnani/adaptive-certify](https://github.com/AlaaAnani/adaptive-certify).
Alaa Anani, Tobias Lorenz 0002, Bernt Schiele, Mario Fritz
ICML1