Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alaa Anani
dblp:368/7744
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 90% Segmentation and scene understanding · 10% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025 Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
randomized smoothing |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025 Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025 Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized Smoothing · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized smoothing · 1.6segmentation · 0.9hierarchical classification · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Pixel-level Certified Explanations via Randomized SmoothingabstractPost-hoc attribution methods aim to explain deep learning predictions by highlighting influential input pixels. However, these explanations are highly non-robust: small, imperceptible input perturbations can drastically alter the attribution map while maintaining the same prediction. This vulnerability undermines their trustworthiness and calls for rigorous robustness guarantees of pixel-level attribution scores. We introduce the first certification framework that guarantees pixel-level robustness for any black-box attribution method using randomized smoothing. By sparsifying and smoothing attribution maps, we reformulate the task as a segmentation problem and certify each pixel’s importance against $\ell_2$-bounded perturbations. We further propose three evaluation metrics to assess certified robustness, localization, and faithfulness. An extensive evaluation of 12 attribution methods across 5 ImageNet models shows that our certified attributions are robust, interpretable, and faithful, enabling reliable use in downstream tasks. Our code is at https://github.com/AlaaAnani/certified-attributions. Alaa Anani, Tobias Lorenz 0002, Mario Fritz, Bernt Schiele |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Adaptive Hierarchical Certification for Segmentation using Randomized SmoothingabstractCertification for machine learning is proving that no adversarial sample can evade a model within a range under certain conditions, a necessity for safety-critical domains. Common certification methods for segmentation use a flat set of fine-grained classes, leading to high abstain rates due to model uncertainty across many classes. We propose a novel, more practical setting, which certifies pixels within a multi-level hierarchy, and adaptively relaxes the certification to a coarser level for unstable components classic methods would abstain from, effectively lowering the abstain rate whilst providing more certified semantically meaningful information. We mathematically formulate the problem setup, introduce an adaptive hierarchical certification algorithm and prove the correctness of its guarantees. Since certified accuracy does not take the loss of information into account for coarser classes, we introduce the Certified Information Gain ($\mathrm{CIG}$) metric, which is proportional to the class granularity level. Our extensive experiments on the datasets Cityscapes, PASCAL-Context, ACDC and COCO-Stuff demonstrate that our adaptive algorithm achieves a higher $\mathrm{CIG}$ and lower abstain rate compared to the current state-of-the-art certification method. Our code can be found here: [https://github.com/AlaaAnani/adaptive-certify](https://github.com/AlaaAnani/adaptive-certify). Alaa Anani, Tobias Lorenz 0002, Bernt Schiele, Mario Fritz |
ICML | 1 |