Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Johannes P. Dürholt
dblp:368/7780
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 84% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
constrained bayesian optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
surrogate model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical Constraints · ICML 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
chemistry |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
design of experiments · 1.7bayesian optimization · 1.7neural network ensemble · 0.8acquisition function · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real ExperimentsabstractOur open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting. Johannes P. Dürholt, Thomas S. Asche, Johanna Kleinekorte, Gabriel Mancino-Ball, Benjamin Schiller, Simon Sung, Julian Keupp, Aaron Osburg, Toby Boyne, Ruth Misener, Rosona Eldred, Chrysoula Kappatou, Robert M. Lee, Dominik Linzner, Wagner Steuer Costa, David Walz, Niklas Wulkow, Behrang Shafei |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2024 | Boundary Exploration for Bayesian Optimization With Unknown Physical ConstraintsabstractBayesian optimization has been successfully applied to optimize black-box functions where the number of evaluations is severely limited. However, in many real-world applications, it is hard or impossible to know in advance which designs are feasible due to some physical or system limitations. These issues lead to an even more challenging problem of optimizing an unknown function with unknown constraints. In this paper, we observe that in such scenarios optimal solution typically lies on the boundary between feasible and infeasible regions of the design space, making it considerably more difficult than that with interior optima. Inspired by this observation, we propose BE-CBO, a new Bayesian optimization method that efficiently explores the boundary between feasible and infeasible designs. To identify the boundary, we learn the constraints with an ensemble of neural networks that outperform the standard Gaussian Processes for capturing complex boundaries. Our method demonstrates superior performance against state-of-the-art methods through comprehensive experiments on synthetic and real-world benchmarks. Code available at: https://github.com/yunshengtian/BE-CBO Yunsheng Tian, Ane Zuniga, Xinwei Zhang 0001, Johannes P. Dürholt, Jie Chen 0007, Wojciech Matusik, Mina Konakovic-Lukovic |
ICML | 4 |