Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Javier Porras-Valenzuela
dblp:368/8138
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 62% Time series and sequential data · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › constrained optimization
constrained learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Loss Shaping Constraints for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › time series forecasting
long-term time series forecasting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Loss Shaping Constraints for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Loss Shaping Constraints for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
primal-dual algorithm · 0.8lagrangian duality · 0.8constrained optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Loss Shaping Constraints for Long-Term Time Series ForecastingabstractSeveral applications in time series forecasting require predicting multiple steps ahead. Despite the vast amount of literature in the topic, both classical and recent deep learning based approaches have mostly focused on minimising performance averaged over the predicted window. We observe that this can lead to disparate distributions of errors across forecasting steps, especially for recent transformer architectures trained on popular forecasting benchmarks. That is, optimising performance on average can lead to undesirably large errors at specific time-steps. In this work, we present a Constrained Learning approach for long-term time series forecasting that aims to find the best model in terms of average performance that respects a user-defined upper bound on the loss at each time-step. We call our approach loss shaping constraints because it imposes constraints on the loss at each time step, and leverage recent duality results to show that despite its non-convexity, the resulting problem has a bounded duality gap. We propose a practical primal-dual algorithm to tackle it, and demonstrate that the proposed approach exhibits competitive average performance in time series forecasting benchmarks, while shaping the distribution of errors across the predicted window. Ignacio Hounie, Javier Porras-Valenzuela, Alejandro Ribeiro |
ICML | 2 |