Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Cahall

dblp:369/3935 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › preference learning
coactive learning
0.812024
Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.812024
Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback
0.812024
Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 0.8coactive learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback
abstract
We propose coactive learning as a model and feedback mechanism for training large language models (LLMs). The key insight is that users provide implicit feedback whenever they edit the text $y$ proposed by an LLM. While the edited text $\bar y$ is typically not a gold-standard example for supervised training, coactive learning merely requires that the edited text $\bar y$ is an improvement over the proposed text $y$. Note that such weak implicit preference feedback $\bar y \succ y$ is available in many application settings on a per-user basis, thus enabling the personalization of LLMs. In this paper, we develop the theoretical basis for coactive training of non-linear models, and we derive CoRLL as the first coactive learning algorithm for LLMs. Empirical results indicate that CoRLL is effective even for weak and noisy coactive preference feedback, making it a promising algorithm for training and personalization of LLMs from feedback that is naturally collected in many use cases.
Aaron D. Tucker, Kianté Brantley, Adam Cahall, Thorsten Joachims
ICML3