Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam Cahall
dblp:369/3935
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 67% Language models and text generation · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › preference learning
coactive learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User Feedback · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 0.8coactive learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Coactive Learning for Large Language Models using Implicit User FeedbackabstractWe propose coactive learning as a model and feedback mechanism for training large language models (LLMs). The key insight is that users provide implicit feedback whenever they edit the text $y$ proposed by an LLM. While the edited text $\bar y$ is typically not a gold-standard example for supervised training, coactive learning merely requires that the edited text $\bar y$ is an improvement over the proposed text $y$. Note that such weak implicit preference feedback $\bar y \succ y$ is available in many application settings on a per-user basis, thus enabling the personalization of LLMs. In this paper, we develop the theoretical basis for coactive training of non-linear models, and we derive CoRLL as the first coactive learning algorithm for LLMs. Empirical results indicate that CoRLL is effective even for weak and noisy coactive preference feedback, making it a promising algorithm for training and personalization of LLMs from feedback that is naturally collected in many use cases. Aaron D. Tucker, Kianté Brantley, Adam Cahall, Thorsten Joachims |
ICML | 3 |