Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yaroslav Aksenov

dblp:369/4488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 48% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Efficient and distributed learning · 16%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.722025
Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models · ICML 2025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model steering
0.912025
Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
offline alignment
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparsity
0.912025
Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › efficient transformer
linear transformer
0.812024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.812024
Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
reward overoptimization
0.312025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse autoencoder · 1.7trust region · 0.9cosine similarity · 0.9KTO · 0.9IPO · 0.9DPO · 0.9learnable kernel functions · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Train One Sparse Autoencoder Across Multiple Sparsity Budgets to Preserve Interpretability and Accuracy
abstract
Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Laptev, Vadim Kurochkin, Gleb Gerasimov, Nikita Koriagin, Daniil Gavrilov. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Laptev, Vadim Kurochkin, Gleb Gerasimov, Nikita Koriagin, Daniil Gavrilov
EMNLP2
2025 Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment
abstract
Despite the fact that offline methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment do not require a direct reward model, they remain susceptible to overoptimization. This issue arises when the trained model deviates excessively from the reference policy, leading to a decrease in sample quality. We propose a novel approach of offline alignment methods, called Trust Region (including variants TR-DPO, TR-IPO, TR-KTO), which dynamically updates the reference policy throughout the training process. Our results show that TR alignment methods effectively mitigate overoptimization, enabling models to maintain strong performance even when substantially deviating from the initial reference policy. We demonstrate the efficacy of these approaches not only through toy examples that exhibit reduced overoptimization, but also through direct, side-by-side comparisons in specific tasks such as helpful and harmless dialogue, as well as summarization, where they surpass conventional methods. Additionally, we report significant improvements in general-purpose assistant setups with the Llama3 model on the AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks, highlighting the advantages of Trust Region methods over classical approaches.
Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Malakhov, Nikita Surnachev, Yaroslav Aksenov, Ian Maksimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
ICLR5
2025 Analyze Feature Flow to Enhance Interpretation and Steering in Language Models
abstract
We introduce a new approach to systematically map features discovered by sparse autoencoder across consecutive layers of large language models, extending earlier work that examined inter-layer feature links. By using a data-free cosine similarity technique, we trace how specific features persist, transform, or first appear at each stage. This method yields granular flow graphs of feature evolution, enabling fine-grained interpretability and mechanistic insights into model computations. Crucially, we demonstrate how these cross-layer feature maps facilitate direct steering of model behavior by amplifying or suppressing chosen features, achieving targeted thematic control in text generation. Together, our findings highlight the utility of a causal, cross-layer interpretability framework that not only clarifies how features develop through forward passes but also provides new means for transparent manipulation of large language models.
Daniil Laptev, Nikita Balagansky, Yaroslav Aksenov, Daniil Gavrilov
ICML3
2024 Linear Transformers with Learnable Kernel Functions are Better In-Context Models
abstract
Yaroslav Aksenov, Nikita Balagansky, Sofia Lo Cicero Vaina, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Gorbatovski, Daniil Gavrilov. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Yaroslav Aksenov, Nikita Balagansky, Sofia Maria Lo Cicero Vaina, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Gorbatovski, Daniil Gavrilov
ACL (1)1