Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Minju Gwak
dblp:369/4493
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 52% Language models and text generation · 36% Vision and language · 12% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
model-based planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
process reward model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
web agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agents · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web Navigation · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
world model · 0.9process reward model · 0.9preference pairs · 0.9large language model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Web Agents with World Models: Learning and Leveraging Environment Dynamics in Web NavigationabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have recently gained much attention in building autonomous agents. However, performance of current LLM-based web agents in long-horizon tasks is far from optimal, often yielding errors such as repeatedly buying a non-refundable flight ticket. By contrast, humans can avoid such an irreversible mistake, as we have an awareness of the potential outcomes (e.g., losing money) of our actions, also known as the "world model". Motivated by this, our study first starts with preliminary analyses, confirming the absence of world models in current LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, etc.). Then, we present a World-model-augmented (WMA) web agent, which simulates the outcomes of its actions for better decision-making. To overcome the challenges in training LLMs as world models predicting next observations, such as repeated elements across observations and long HTML inputs, we propose a transition-focused observation abstraction, where the prediction objectives are free-form natural language descriptions exclusively highlighting important state differences between time steps. Experiments on WebArena and Mind2Web show that our world models improve agents' policy selection without training and demonstrate our agents' cost- and time-efficiency compared to recent tree-search-based agents. Hyungjoo Chae, Namyoung Kim, Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Minju Gwak, Gwanwoo Song, Sunghwan Kim 0005, Dongha Lee 0003, Jinyoung Yeo |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Towards Lifelong Dialogue Agents via Timeline-based Memory ManagementabstractKai Tzu-iunn Ong, Namyoung Kim, Minju Gwak, Hyungjoo Chae, Taeyoon Kwon, Yohan Jo, Seung-won Hwang, Dongha Lee, Jinyoung Yeo. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Kai Tzu-iunn Ong, Namyoung Kim, Minju Gwak, Hyungjoo Chae, Taeyoon Kwon, Yohan Jo, Seung-won Hwang, Dongha Lee 0003, Jinyoung Yeo |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 3 |
| 2025 | Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web AgentsabstractWeb navigation is a unique domain that can automate many repetitive real-life tasks and is challenging as it requires long-horizon sequential decision making beyond typical multimodal large language model (MLLM) tasks.
Yet, specialized reward models for web navigation that can be utilized during both training and test-time have been absent until now. Despite the importance of speed and cost-effectiveness, prior works have utilized MLLMs as reward models, which poses significant constraints for real-world deployment. To address this, in this work, we propose the first process reward model (PRM) called Web-Shepherd which could assess web navigation trajectories in a step-level. To achieve this, we first construct the WebPRM Collection, a large-scale dataset with 40K step-level preference pairs and annotated checklists spanning diverse domains and difficulty levels. Next, we also introduce the WebRewardBench, the first meta-evaluation benchmark for evaluating PRMs. In our experiments, we observe that our Web-Shepherd achieves about 30 points better accuracy compared to using GPT-4o on WebRewardBench.
Furthermore, when testing on WebArena-lite by using GPT-4o-mini as the policy and Web-Shepherd as the verifier, we achieve 10.9 points better performance, in 10x less cost compared to using GPT-4o-mini as the verifier.
Our model, dataset, and code are publicly available at https://github.com/kyle8581/Web-Shepherd. Hyungjoo Chae, Seonghwan Kim, Seungone Kim, Seungjun Moon, Gyeom Hwangbo, Dongha Lim, Minjin Kim, Yeonjun Hwang, Minju Gwak, Dongwook Choi, Gwanhoon Im, ByeongUng Cho, Hyojun Kim, Jun Hee Han, Taeyoon Kwon, Beong-woo Kwak, Dongjin Kang, Jinyoung Yeo |
NeurIPS | 10 |