Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jia-He Yao
dblp:369/5940
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information theory
hypothesis testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences For Two-Sample Test · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information theory › hypothesis testing
two-sample testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences For Two-Sample Test · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences For Two-Sample Test · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mahalanobis kernel · 1.3bi-directional hypothesis testing · 1.3familywise error rate control · 0.7family-wise error rate control · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | On the Exploration of Local Significant Differences For Two-Sample TestabstractRecent years have witnessed increasing attentions on two-sample test with diverse real applications, while this work takes one more step on the exploration of local significant differences for two-sample test. We propose the ME$_\text{MaBiD}$, an effective test for two-sample testing, and the basic idea is to exploit local information by multiple Mahalanobis kernels and introduce bi-directional hypothesis for testing. On the exploration of local significant differences, we first partition the embedding space into several rectangle regions via a new splitting criterion, which is relevant to test power and data correlation. We then explore local significant differences based on our bi-directional masked $p$-value together with the ME$_\text{MaBiD}$ test. Theoretically, we present the asymptotic distribution and lower bounds of test power for our ME$_\text{MaBiD}$ test, and control the familywise error rate on the exploration of local significant differences. We finally conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of our proposed methods on two-sample test and the exploration of local significant differences. Zhijian Zhou, Jie Ni, Jia-He Yao |
NeurIPS | 3 |