Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhen-Hua Zhuang
dblp:369/7067
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distributionally robust optimization
group distributionally robust optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
stochastic mirror descent |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic mirror descent · 1.3online learning · 1.3multi-armed bandit · 1.3stochastic mirror-prox · 0.7stochastic mirror prox · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Soft Contrastive Learning for Implicit Feedback Recommendations
Zhen-Hua Zhuang |
PAKDD (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | Stochastic Approximation Approaches to Group Distributionally Robust OptimizationabstractThis paper investigates group distributionally robust optimization (GDRO), with the purpose to learn a model that performs well over $m$ different distributions. First, we formulate GDRO as a stochastic convex-concave saddle-point problem, and demonstrate that stochastic mirror descent (SMD), using $m$ samples in each iteration, achieves an $O(m (\log m)/\epsilon^2)$ sample complexity for finding an $\epsilon$-optimal solution, which matches the $\Omega(m/\epsilon^2)$ lower bound up to a logarithmic factor. Then, we make use of techniques from online learning to reduce the number of samples required in each round from $m$ to $1$, keeping the same sample complexity. Specifically, we cast GDRO as a two-players game where one player simply performs SMD and the other executes an online algorithm for non-oblivious multi-armed bandits. Next, we consider a more practical scenario where the number of samples that can be drawn from each distribution is different, and propose a novel formulation of weighted GDRO, which allows us to derive distribution-dependent convergence rates. Denote by $n_i$ the sample budget for the $i$-th distribution, and assume $n_1 \geq n_2 \geq \cdots \geq n_m$. In the first approach, we incorporate non-uniform sampling into SMD such that the sample budget is satisfied in expectation, and prove that the excess risk of the $i$-th distribution decreases at an $O(\sqrt{n_1 \log m}/n_i)$ rate. In the second approach, we use mini-batches to meet the budget exactly and also reduce the variance in stochastic gradients, and then leverage stochastic mirror-prox algorithm, which can exploit small variances, to optimize a carefully designed weighted GDRO problem. Under appropriate conditions, it attains an $O((\log m)/\sqrt{n_i})$ convergence rate, which almost matches the optimal $O(\sqrt{1/n_i})$ rate of only learning from the $i$-th distribution with $n_i$ samples. Lijun Zhang 0005, Peng Zhao 0006, Zhen-Hua Zhuang, Tianbao Yang, Zhi-Hua Zhou |
NeurIPS | 3 |