EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lianghe Shi
dblp:369/7181
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8972-7641ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Generative modeling · 19% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
2.3 | 3 | 2025 | Adversarially robust unsupervised domain adaptation · Artif. Intell. 2025 A Closer Look at Curriculum Adversarial Training: From an Online Perspective · AAAI 2024 Adversarial Self-Training Improves Robustness and Generalization for Gradual Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | A Closer Look at Curriculum Adversarial Training: From an Online Perspective · AAAI 2024 Adversarial Self-Training Improves Robustness and Generalization for Gradual Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
model collapse |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization Perspective · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adversarially robust unsupervised domain adaptation · Artif. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Adversarially robust unsupervised domain adaptation · Artif. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › continual domain adaptation
gradual domain adaptation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Adversarial Self-Training Improves Robustness and Generalization for Gradual Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | A Closer Look at Curriculum Adversarial Training: From an Online Perspective · AAAI 2024 Adversarial Self-Training Improves Robustness and Generalization for Gradual Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recursive training on synthetic data · 0.9entropy analysis · 0.9adversarial training · 0.9time series prediction · 0.8generalization error bound · 0.8pseudo-labeling · 0.7adversarial self-training · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Closer Look at Model Collapse: From a Generalization-to-Memorization PerspectiveabstractThe widespread use of diffusion models has led to an abundance of AI-generated data, raising concerns about model collapse---a phenomenon in which recursive iterations of training on synthetic data lead to performance degradation. Prior work primarily characterizes this collapse via variance shrinkage or distribution shift, but these perspectives miss practical manifestations of model collapse. This paper identifies a transition from generalization to memorization during model collapse in diffusion models, where models increasingly replicate training data instead of generating novel content during iterative training on synthetic samples. This transition is directly driven by the declining entropy of the synthetic training data produced in each training cycle, which serves as a clear indicator of model degradation. Motivated by this insight, we propose an entropy-based data selection strategy to mitigate the transition from generalization to memorization and alleviate model collapse. Empirical results show that our approach significantly enhances visual quality and diversity in recursive generation, effectively preventing collapse. Lianghe Shi, Molei Tao, Qing Qu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Adversarially robust unsupervised domain adaptation
Lianghe Shi |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2024 | A Closer Look at Curriculum Adversarial Training: From an Online PerspectiveabstractCurriculum adversarial training empirically finds that gradually increasing the hardness of adversarial examples can further improve the adversarial robustness of the trained model compared to conventional adversarial training. However, theoretical understanding of this strategy remains limited. In an attempt to bridge this gap, we analyze the adversarial training process from an online perspective. Specifically, we treat adversarial examples in different iterations as samples from different adversarial distributions. We then introduce the time series prediction framework and deduce novel generalization error bounds. Our theoretical results not only demonstrate the effectiveness of the conventional adversarial training algorithm but also explain why curriculum adversarial training methods can further improve adversarial generalization. We conduct comprehensive experiments to support our theory. Lianghe Shi |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | Adversarial Self-Training Improves Robustness and Generalization for Gradual Domain AdaptationabstractGradual Domain Adaptation (GDA), in which the learner is provided with additional intermediate domains, has been theoretically and empirically studied in many contexts. Despite its vital role in security-critical scenarios, the adversarial robustness of the GDA model remains unexplored. In this paper, we adopt the effective gradual self-training method and replace vanilla self-training with adversarial self-training (AST). AST first predicts labels on the unlabeled data and then adversarially trains the model on the pseudo-labeled distribution. Intriguingly, we find that gradual AST improves not only adversarial accuracy but also clean accuracy on the target domain. We reveal that this is because adversarial training (AT) performs better than standard training when the pseudo-labels contain a portion of incorrect labels. Accordingly, we first present the generalization error bounds for gradual AST in a multiclass classification setting. We then use the optimal value of the Subset Sum Problem to bridge the standard error on a real distribution and the adversarial error on a pseudo-labeled distribution. The result indicates that AT may obtain a tighter bound than standard training on data with incorrect pseudo-labels. We further present an example of a conditional Gaussian distribution to provide more insights into why gradual AST can improve the clean accuracy for GDA. Lianghe Shi |
NeurIPS | 1 |