Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Zhao

dblp:369/7732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 41% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Language models and text generation · 18%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.832025
Flexible Group Count Enables Hassle-Free Structured Pruning · CVPR 2025
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
1.522025
Flexible Group Count Enables Hassle-Free Structured Pruning · CVPR 2025
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation
0.912025
The Ingredients for Robotic Diffusion Transformers · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
efficient attention
0.912025
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.912025
Squeezed Attention: Accelerating Long Context Length LLM Inference · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large reasoning model
0.912025
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › chain-of-thought reasoning
long chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
sparse attention
0.912025
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Human-AI interaction › AI-mediated work
AI-assisted programming
0.912025
Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming · CHI 2025
Human-AI interaction › mixed-initiative interaction
proactive AI assistance
0.912025
Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming · CHI 2025
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.912025
Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming · CHI 2025
Program synthesis and code generation › code assistance
programming assistant
0.912025
Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming · CHI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion transformer
0.312025
The Ingredients for Robotic Diffusion Transformers · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › KV cache management
KV cache compression
0.312025
Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
long-context inference
0.312025
Squeezed Attention: Accelerating Long Context Length LLM Inference · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.312025
The Ingredients for Robotic Diffusion Transformers · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
channel pruning
0.212023
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.212023
One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer architecture · 0.9one-shot post-train pruning · 0.9kernel implementation · 0.9grouped convolution · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9clustering · 0.9cluster centroid approximation · 0.9attention squeezing · 0.9one-shot pruning · 0.7grouped kernel pruning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Squeezed Attention: Accelerating Long Context Length LLM Inference
abstract
Coleman Richard Charles Hooper, Sehoon Kim, Hiva Mohammadzadeh, Monishwaran Maheswaran, Sebastian Zhao, June Paik, Michael W. Mahoney, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Coleman Hooper, Sehoon Kim 0001, Hiva Mohammadzadeh, Monishwaran Maheswaran, Sebastian Zhao, June Paik, Michael W. Mahoney, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami
ACL (1)5
2025 Need Help? Designing Proactive AI Assistants for Programming
Valerie Chen, Alan Zhu 0003, Sebastian Zhao, Hussein Mozannar, David A. Sontag, Ameet Talwalkar
CHI3
2025 Flexible Group Count Enables Hassle-Free Structured Pruning
abstract
Densely structured pruning methods — which generate pruned models in a fully dense format, allowing immediate compression benefits without additional demands — are evolving due to their practical significance. Traditional techniques in this domain mainly revolve around coarser granularities, such as filter pruning, thereby limiting performance due to restricted pruning freedom. Recent advancements in Grouped Kernel Pruning (GKP) have enabled the utilization of finer granularities while maintaining a densely structured format. We observe that existing GKP methods often introduce dynamic operations to different aspects of their procedures at the cost of adding complications and/or imposing limitations (e.g., requiring an expensive mixture of clustering schemes), or contain dynamic pruning rates and sizes among groups that result in a reliance on custom architecture support for its pruned models. In this work, we argue that the best practice to introduce these dynamic operations to GKP is to make Conv2d(groups) (a.k.a. group count) flexible under an integral optimization, leveraging its ideal alignment with the infrastructure support of Grouped Convolution. Pursuing such a direction, we present a one-shot, post-train, data-agnostic GKP method that is more performant, adaptive, and efficient than its predecessors while simultaneously being user-friendly, with little-to-no hyper-parameter tuning or handcrafting of criteria required.
Jiamu Zhang, Shaochen Zhong, Andrew Ye, Zirui Liu 0001, Sebastian Zhao, Kaixiong Zhou, Li Li 0035, Soo-Hyun Choi, Rui Chen 0012, Xia Ben Hu, Vipin Chaudhary
CVPR5
2025 The Ingredients for Robotic Diffusion Transformers
abstract
In recent years roboticists have achieved remarkable progress in solving increasingly general tasks on dexterous robotic hardware by leveraging high capacity Transformer network architectures and generative diffusion models. Unfortunately, combining these two orthogonal improvements has proven surprisingly difficult, since there is no clear and well-understood process for making important design choices. In this paper, we identify, study and improve key architectural design decisions for high-capacity diffusion transformer policies. The resulting models can efficiently solve diverse tasks on multiple robot embodiments, without the excruciating pain of per-setup hyper-parameter tuning. By combining the results of our investigation with our improved model components, we are able to present a novel architecture, named DiT-Block Policy, that significantly outperforms the state of the art in solving long-horizon ($1500+ \text{time-steps}$) dexterous tasks on a bi-manual ALOHA robot. In addition, we find that our policies show improved scaling performance when trained on 10 hours of highly multi-modal, language annotated ALOHA demonstration data. We hope this work will open the door for future robot learning techniques that leverage the efficiency of generative diffusion modeling with the scalability of large scale transformer architectures. Code, robot dataset, and videos are available at: https://dit-policy.github.io
Sudeep Dasari, Oier Mees, Sebastian Zhao, Mohan Kumar Srirama, Sergey Levine
ICRA3
2025 Multipole Attention for Efficient Long Context Reasoning
abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown promising accuracy improvements on complex problem-solving tasks. While these models have attained high accuracy by leveraging additional computation at test time, they need to generate long chain-of-thought reasoning in order to think before answering, which requires generating thousands of tokens. While sparse attention methods can help reduce the KV cache pressure induced by this long autoregressive reasoning, these methods can introduce errors which disrupt the reasoning process. Our work addresses these challenges by introducing Multipole Attention, which accelerates autoregressive reasoning by only computing exact attention for the most important tokens, while maintaining approximate representations for the remaining tokens. Our method first performs clustering to group together semantically similar key vectors, and then uses the cluster centroids both to identify important key vectors and to approximate the remaining key vectors in order to retain high accuracy. Additionally, in order to accelerate long generation tasks, we design a fast cluster update process to quickly re-cluster the input and previously generated tokens, thereby allowing for accelerating attention to the previous output tokens. We evaluate our method using emerging LRMs such as Qwen-8B and Deepseek-R1-Distil-Qwen2.5-14B, demonstrating that our approach can maintain accuracy on complex reasoning tasks even with aggressive attention sparsity settings. We also provide kernel implementations to demonstrate the practical efficiency gains from our method, achieving up to 4.5$\times$ speedup for attention in long-context reasoning applications.
Coleman Hooper, Sebastian Zhao, Luca Manolache, Sehoon Kim 0001, Michael W. Mahoney, Sophia Shao, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami
NeurIPS2
2023 One Less Reason for Filter Pruning: Gaining Free Adversarial Robustness with Structured Grouped Kernel Pruning
abstract
Densely structured pruning methods utilizing simple pruning heuristics can deliver immediate compression and acceleration benefits with acceptable benign performances. However, empirical findings indicate such naively pruned networks are extremely fragile under simple adversarial attacks. Naturally, we would be interested in knowing if such a phenomenon also holds for carefully designed modern structured pruning methods. If so, then to what extent is the severity? And what kind of remedies are available? Unfortunately, both the questions and the solution remain largely unaddressed: no prior art is able to provide a thorough investigation on the adversarial performance of modern structured pruning methods (spoiler: it is not good), yet the few works that attempt to provide mitigation often do so at various extra costs with only to-be-desired performance. In this work, we answer both questions by fairly and comprehensively investigating the adversarial performance of 10+ popular structured pruning methods. Solution-wise, we take advantage of *Grouped Kernel Pruning (GKP)*'s recent success in pushing densely structured pruning freedom to a more fine-grained level. By mixing up kernel smoothness — a classic robustness-related kernel-level metric — into a modified GKP procedure, we present a one-shot-post-train-weight-dependent GKP method capable of advancing SOTA performance on both the benign and adversarial scale, while requiring no extra (in fact, often less) cost than a standard pruning procedure. Please refer to our [GitHub repository](https://github.com/henryzhongsc/adv_robust_gkp) for code implementation, tool sharing, and model checkpoints.
Shaochen Zhong, Zaichuan You, Jiamu Zhang, Sebastian Zhao, Zachary LeClaire, Zirui Liu 0001, Daochen Zha, Vipin Chaudhary, Xia Ben Hu
NeurIPS4