Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ralf Becker

dblp:37/1461 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
loop closure detection
0.912025
Introspective Loop Closure for SLAM with 4D Imaging Radar · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › non-visual SLAM
radar SLAM
0.912025
Introspective Loop Closure for SLAM with 4D Imaging Radar · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.912025
Introspective Loop Closure for SLAM with 4D Imaging Radar · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submap generation · 0.9introspective measures · 0.94d imaging radar · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Introspective Loop Closure for SLAM with 4D Imaging Radar
abstract
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) allows mobile robots to navigate without external positioning systems or pre-existing maps. Radar is emerging as a valuable sensing tool, especially in vision-obstructed environments, as it is less affected by particles than lidars or cameras. Modern 4D imaging radars provide three-dimensional geometric information and relative velocity measurements, but they bring challenges, such as a small field of view and sparse, noisy point clouds. Detecting loop closures in SLAM is critical for reducing trajectory drift and maintaining map accuracy. However, the directional nature of 4D radar data makes identifying loop closures, especially from reverse viewpoints, difficult due to limited scan overlap. This article explores using 4D radar for loop closure in SLAM, focusing on similar and opposing viewpoints. We generate submaps for a denser environment representation and use introspective measures to reject false detections in feature-degenerate environments. Our experiments show accurate loop closure detection in geometrically diverse settings for both similar and opposing viewpoints, improving trajectory estimation with up to 82% improvement in ATE and rejecting false positives in self-similar environments.
Maximilian Hilger, Vladimir Kubelka, Daniel Adolfsson, Ralf Becker, Henrik Andreasson, Achim J. Lilienthal
ICRA4
2022 Student Success in Asynchronous STEM Education: measuring and identifying contributors to learner outcomes
abstract
Existing experience with educational institutions that track student outcomes in relation to the time spent on formative activities has demonstrated a consistent positive correlation with improved student outcomes. This study is centred on Higher Education using data from the asynchronous learning platform Möbius, and produces a data-driven validation of the positive correlation between time spent on formative activities and improved student outcomes in an asynchronous online learning environment, and further builds a basis of insights identified as contributors to successful student outcomes. We identified “distance” in time of first engagement in study before an Exam as an early indicator of success, where we found a moderate positive correlation, whereas there was a weak correlation for the same behavior with respect to Practice Tests and Tests. The behaviors identified in this study raised more opportunities for further study on the nature of student engagement through their learning progression, and other early behavioral indicators for successful student outcomes.
Aron Pasieka, Ralf Becker, Christina Perdikoulias
EDUCON3