Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert McArthur

dblp:37/1534 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
interactive information retrieval
0.012000
Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval
query reformulation
0.012000
Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval
search interfaces
0.012000
Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval
retrieval evaluation
0.012000
Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared · SIGIR 2000
Information retrieval › evaluation
search effectiveness
0.012000
Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared · SIGIR 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

controlled user study · 0.0cognitive load measurement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Understanding Individual Experiences of Chronic Illness with Semantic Space Models of Electronic Discussions
abstract
Electronic discussion groups provide a convenient forum for individuals to share their experiences of chronic illness. The language use of individual participants, and the way their language shifts over time, may provide implicit indications of important shifts in sense-of-self. This paper relates experience with application of the hyperspace analogue to language (HAL) model for automatic construction of a dimensional model from a corpus of text. HAL is applied to 17 months of discussion on a closed list of 20 women coping with chronic illness. The discussion group was moderated for a focus the phenomenon of "Transition' - how people can learn to incorporate the consequences of illness into their lives. The current phase of research focuses on identification of clusters of words that can represent key aspects of Transition. The HAL models for two participants have been analyzed by experts in Transition to form candidate clusters. These clusters are then used as a basis for contrasting the language usage of an individual participant over time as compared to the entire corpus. We have not yet found a reliable basis for identifying transitions in an individual based on their entries into a discussion forum, although the clusters may have some inherent value for introspection on individual experiences and Transition in general. We report challenges for interpretation of the HAL model related to the correlation of dimensions and the impact of group dynamics.
Guocai Chen, Robert McArthur, Peter Bruza, Debbie Kralik, Kay Price
CBMS3
2003 Discovery of Implicit and Explicit Connections Between People Using Email Utterance
Robert McArthur, Peter Bruza
ECSCW1
2002 Web searching: A process-oriented experimental study of three interactive search paradigms
abstract
Abstract This article compares search effectiveness when using query‐based Internet search (via the Google search engine), directory‐based search (via Yahoo), and phrase‐based query reformulation‐assisted search (via the Hyperindex browser) by means of a controlled, user‐based experimental study. The focus was to evaluate aspects of the search process. Cognitive load was measured using a secondary digit‐monitoring task to quantify the effort of the user in various search states; independent relevance judgements were employed to gauge the quality of the documents accessed during the search process and time was monitored as a function of search state. Results indicated directory‐based search does not offer increased relevance over the query‐based search (with or without query formulation assistance), and also takes longer. Query reformulation does significantly improve the relevance of the documents through which the user must trawl, particularly when the formulation of query terms is more difficult. However, the improvement in document relevance comes at the cost of increased search time, although this difference is quite small when the search is self‐terminated. In addition, the advantage of the query reformulation seems to occur as a consequence of providing more discriminating terms rather than by increasing the length of queries.
Simon Dennis 0001, Peter Bruza, Robert McArthur
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.3
2001 The ABC's of Online Community
Robert McArthur, Peter Bruza
Web Intelligence1
2000 Interactive Internet search: keyword, directory and query reformulation mechanisms compared
abstract
This article compares search effectiveness when using query-based Internet search (via the Google search engine), directory-based search (via Yahoo) and phrase-based query reformulation assisted search (via the Hyperindex browser) by means of a controlled, user-based experimental study. The focus was to evaluate aspects of the search process. Cognitive load was measured using a secondary digit-monitoring task to quantify the effort of the user in various search states; independent relevance judgements were employed to gauge the quality of the documents accessed during the search process. Time was monitored in various search states. Results indicated the directory-based search does not offer increased relevance over the query-based search (with or without query formulation assistance), and also takes longer. Query reformulation does significantly improve the relevance of the documents through which the user must trawl versus standard query-based internet search. However, the improvement in document relevance comes at the cost of increased search time and increased cognitive load.
Peter Bruza, Robert McArthur, Simon Dennis 0001
SIGIR2