Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Montasser Ouaily
dblp:37/1916
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models |
0.0 | 2 | 1989 | Performance Analysis of Message Delay Limited Synchronous Communication and Queueing Systems · INFOCOM 1989 Performance of finite capacity communication and queueing systems under various service and buffer preemption policies · INFOCOM 1988 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models
discrete-time queue |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Performance Analysis of Message Delay Limited Synchronous Communication and Queueing Systems · INFOCOM 1989 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › network performance analysis
throughput and delay analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Performance Analysis of Message Delay Limited Synchronous Communication and Queueing Systems · INFOCOM 1989 |
Physical-layer communications
multiple access |
0.0 | 1 | 1989 | Performance Analysis of Message Delay Limited Synchronous Communication and Queueing Systems · INFOCOM 1989 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance comparison · 0.0geom/g/1 queueing analysis · 0.0m/g/1/n queueing analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | Performance Analysis of Message Delay Limited Synchronous Communication and Queueing SystemsabstractAnalysis and performance comparisons are presented for synchronous discrete-time queuing systems operating under a message waiting-time or delay-time constraint. Four different system admission and preemption policies are investigated. Under either a wait-time constraint or a delay-time limit, either newly arriving messages are always admitted (and then properly dismissed if their required residence limits are not met) or a determination is made upon arrival on whether the new message can be served to completion within its required time limit, and only then is this message admitted. The delay-throughput performance of these admission and service-preemption policies is investigated and compared for synchronous discrete-time communications and processing systems modeled as a single-server Geom/G/1 discrete-time queuing system. Such models are used to describe various multiplexing and demand-assigned (reservation-based) multiple-access communication network systems operating under message delay limits.> Izhak Rubin, Montasser Ouaily |
INFOCOM | 2 |
| 1988 | Performance of finite capacity communication and queueing systems under various service and buffer preemption policiesabstractThe authors carry out message delay and system throughput analysis for communication and telecommunications system applications which require the use of finite-capacity service systems using preemptive buffering (PB) disciplines. Such systems are of particular importance in situation where it is essential to provide short (and at times, bounded) message waiting-time delays, for messages which are selected for service. The authors analyze and compare the performance of such service systems, modeling them as finite capacity M/G/1/N queueing systems and using the service/buffering policies first-come-first-served/nonpreemptive buffering (FCFS/NPB), FCFS/PB, and last-come-first-served/preemptive buffering (LCFS/PB). They evaluate the performance tradeoffs offered by these policies, as they relate to the mean and variance of the waiting times of messages which are eventually served or eventually rejected/preempted.> Izhak Rubin, Montasser Ouaily |
INFOCOM | 2 |