Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Michael C. Martin

dblp:37/2343 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0002-6611-070XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
4 papers
Program analysis · 71% Program verification · 16% Debugging and program repair · 11%
Network and information security
2 papers
Systems and software security · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Query processing and optimization · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis › static analysis
pointer analysis
0.122005
Context-sensitive program analysis as database queries · PODS 2005
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery
0.122008
Automatic Generation of XSS and SQL Injection Attacks with Goal-Directed Model Checking · USENIX Security Symposium 2008
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Program analysis
static analysis
0.122005
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Automatic extraction of object-oriented component interfaces · ISSTA 2002
Systems and software security › exploitation
automated exploit generation
0.112008
Automatic Generation of XSS and SQL Injection Attacks with Goal-Directed Model Checking · USENIX Security Symposium 2008
Program verification
automated reasoning and model checking
0.112008
Automatic Generation of XSS and SQL Injection Attacks with Goal-Directed Model Checking · USENIX Security Symposium 2008
Program analysis › static analysis › interprocedural analysis
context-sensitive analysis
0.112005
Context-sensitive program analysis as database queries · PODS 2005
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.112005
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.112005
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Program analysis › dynamic analysis
runtime instrumentation
0.112005
Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language · OOPSLA 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012002
Automatic extraction of object-oriented component interfaces · ISSTA 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model checking · 0.2program query language · 0.1flow-insensitive analysis · 0.1datalog · 0.1context-sensitive analysis · 0.1static analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Securing web applications with static and dynamic information flow tracking
abstract
SQL injection and cross-site scripting are two of the most common security vulnerabilities that plague web applications today. These and many others result from having unchecked data input reach security-sensitive operations. This paper describes a language called PQL (Program Query Language) that allows users to declare to specify information flow patterns succinctly and declaratively. We have developed a static context-sensitive, but flow-insensitive information flow tracking analysis that can be used to find all the vulnerabilities in a program. In the event that the analysis generates too many warnings, the result can be used to drive a model-checking system to analyze more precisely. Model checking is also used to automatically generate the input vectors that expose the vulnerability. Any remaining behavior these static analyses have not isolated may be checked dynamically. The results of the static analyses may be used to optimize these dynamic checks.
Monica S. Lam, Michael C. Martin, Benjamin Livshits, John Whaley
PEPM2
2008 Automatic Generation of XSS and SQL Injection Attacks with Goal-Directed Model Checking
Michael C. Martin, Monica S. Lam
USENIX Security Symposium1
2005 Finding application errors and security flaws using PQL: a program query language
abstract
A number of effective error detection tools have been built in recent years to check if a program conforms to certain design rules. An important class of design rules deals with sequences of events asso-ciated with a set of related objects. This paper presents a language called PQL (Program Query Language) that allows programmers to express such questions easily in an application-specific context. A query looks like a code excerpt corresponding to the shortest amount of code that would violate a design rule. Details of the tar-get application's precise implementation are abstracted away. The programmer may also specify actions to perform when a match is found, such as recording relevant information or even correcting an erroneous execution on the fly.We have developed both static and dynamic techniques to find solutions to PQL queries. Our static analyzer finds all potential matches conservatively using a context-sensitive, flow-insensitive, inclusion-based pointer alias analysis. Static results are also use-ful in reducing the number of instrumentation points for dynamic analysis. Our dynamic analyzer instruments the source program to catch all violations precisely as the program runs and to optionally perform user-specified actions.We have implemented the techniques described in this paper and found 206 errors in 6 large real-world open-source Java applica-tions containing a total of nearly 60,000 classes. These errors are important security flaws, resource leaks, and violations of consis-tency invariants. The combination of static and dynamic analysis proves effective at addressing a wide range of debugging and pro-gram comprehension queries. We have found that dynamic analysis is especially suitable for preventing errors such as security vulner-abilities at runtime.
Michael C. Martin, Benjamin Livshits, Monica S. Lam
OOPSLA1
2005 Context-sensitive program analysis as database queries
abstract
Program analysis has been increasingly used in software engineering tasks such as auditing programs for security vulnerabilities and finding errors in general. Such tools often require analyses much more sophisticated than those traditionally used in compiler optimizations. In particular, context-sensitive pointer alias information is a prerequisite for any sound and precise analysis that reasons about uses of heap objects in a program. Context-sensitive analysis is challenging because there are over 1014 contexts in a typical large program, even after recursive cycles are collapsed. Moreover, pointers cannot be resolved in general without analyzing the entire program.
Monica S. Lam, John Whaley, Benjamin Livshits, Michael C. Martin, Dzintars Avots, Michael Carbin, Christopher Unkel
PODS4
2002 Automatic extraction of object-oriented component interfaces
John Whaley, Michael C. Martin, Monica S. Lam
ISSTA2
2002 Design, implementation and testing of extended and mixed precision BLAS
abstract
This article describes the design rationale, a C implementation, and conformance testing of a subset of the new Standard for the BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines): Extended and Mixed Precision BLAS. Permitting higher internal precision and mixed input/output types and precisions allows us to implement some algorithms that are simpler, more accurate, and sometimes faster than possible without these features. The new BLAS are challenging to implement and test because there are many more subroutines than in the existing Standard, and because we must be able to assess whether a higher precision is used for internal computations than is used for either input or output variables. We have therefore developed an automated process of generating and systematically testing these routines. Our methodology is applicable to languages besides C. In particular, our algorithms used in the testing code will be valuable to all other BLAS implementors. Our extra precision routines achieve excellent performance---close to half of the machine peak Megaflop rate even for the Level 2 BLAS, when the data access is stride one.
Xiaoye S. Li, James Demmel, David H. Bailey, Greg Henry, Yozo Hida, Jimmy Iskandar, William Kahan, Suh Y. Kang, Anil Kapur, Michael C. Martin, Brandon Thompson, Teresa Tung, Daniel J. Yoo
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.10