Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Heilman

dblp:37/2741 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Face, body and person analysis · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities
scientometrics
0.112011
Predicting a Scientific Community's Response to an Article · EMNLP 2011
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › affective computing
emotion modeling
0.112005
Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005
Human-AI interaction
affective computing
0.112005
Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction · AAAI 2005
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Effective Feature Integration for Automated Short Answer Scoring
abstract
A major opportunity for NLP to have a realworld impact is in helping educators score student writing, particularly content-based writing (i.e., the task of automated short answer scoring).A major challenge in this enterprise is that scored responses to a particular question (i.e., labeled data) are valuable for modeling but limited in quantity.Additional information from the scoring guidelines for humans, such as exemplars for each score level and descriptions of key concepts, can also be used.Here, we explore methods for integrating scoring guidelines and labeled responses, and we find that stacked generalization (Wolpert, 1992) improves performance, especially for small training sets.
Keisuke Sakaguchi, Michael Heilman, Nitin Madnani
HLT-NAACL2
2012 Identifying High-Level Organizational Elements in Argumentative Discourse
Nitin Madnani, Michael Heilman, Joel R. Tetreault, Martin Chodorow
HLT-NAACL2
2011 Predicting a Scientific Community's Response to an Article
Dani Yogatama, Michael Heilman, Brendan T. O'Connor 0001, Chris Dyer, Bryan R. Routledge, Noah A. Smith
EMNLP2
2010 Good Question! Statistical Ranking for Question Generation
Michael Heilman, Noah A. Smith
HLT-NAACL1
2010 Tree Edit Models for Recognizing Textual Entailments, Paraphrases, and Answers to Questions
Michael Heilman, Noah A. Smith
HLT-NAACL1
2008 Automatically Generating and Validating Reading-Check Questions
Christine M. Feeney, Michael Heilman
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2008 Self-assessment in Vocabulary Tutoring
Michael Heilman, Maxine Eskénazi
Intelligent Tutoring Systems1
2008 Word Sense Disambiguation for Vocabulary Learning
Anagha Kulkarni 0001, Michael Heilman, Maxine Eskénazi, Jamie Callan
Intelligent Tutoring Systems2
2007 Choosing Reading Passages for Vocabulary Learning by Topic to Increase Intrinsic Motivation
Michael Heilman, Alan Juffs, Maxine Eskénazi
AIED1
2007 Combining Lexical and Grammatical Features to Improve Readability Measures for First and Second Language Texts
Michael Heilman, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Jamie Callan, Maxine Eskénazi
HLT-NAACL1
2006 Classroom success of an intelligent tutoring system for lexical practice and reading comprehension
abstract
We present an intelligent tutoring system called REAP that provides reader-specific lexical practice for improved reading comprehension. REAP offers individualized practice to students by presenting authentic and appropriate reading materials selected automatically from the web. We encountered a number of challenges that must be met in order for the system to be effective in a classroom setting. These include general challenges for a system that uses authentic materials, as well as more specific challenges that arise from integrating the system with pre-existing classroom curricula. We discuss how these challenges were met, and present evidence that REAP has gained acceptance into the classroom at the English Language Institute at the University of Pittsburgh. 1. System Description
Michael Heilman, Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Jamie Callan, Maxine Eskénazi
INTERSPEECH1
2005 Toward Affective Cognitive Robots for Human-Robot Interaction
Matthias Scheutz, James F. Kramer, Christopher Middendorff, Paul W. Schermerhorn, Michael Heilman, P. Bui
AAAI5
2005 MALT - a Multi-lingual Adaptive Language Tutor
Matthias Scheutz, Michael Heilman, Aaron Wenger, Colleen Ryan-Scheutz
AIED2