Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanjay Shete
dblp:37/3479
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7622-376XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Reconstructing distances in physical maps of chromosomes with nonoverlapping probes · RECOMB 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
physical mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Reconstructing distances in physical maps of chromosomes with nonoverlapping probes · RECOMB 2000 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Reconstructing distances in physical maps of chromosomes with nonoverlapping probes · RECOMB 2000 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Reconstructing distances in physical maps of chromosomes with nonoverlapping probes · RECOMB 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
maximum likelihood · 0.1continuous optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Iam hiQ - a novel pair of accuracy indices for imputed genotypesabstractBACKGROUND: Imputation of untyped markers is a standard tool in genome-wide association studies to close the gap between directly genotyped and other known DNA variants. However, high accuracy with which genotypes are imputed is fundamental. Several accuracy measures have been proposed and some are implemented in imputation software, unfortunately diversely across platforms. In the present paper, we introduce Iam hiQ, an independent pair of accuracy measures that can be applied to dosage files, the output of all imputation software. Iam (imputation accuracy measure) quantifies the average amount of individual-specific versus population-specific genotype information in a linear manner. hiQ (heterogeneity in quantities of dosages) addresses the inter-individual heterogeneity between dosages of a marker across the sample at hand. RESULTS: Applying both measures to a large case-control sample of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO), comprising 27,065 individuals, we found meaningful thresholds for Iam and hiQ suitable to classify markers of poor accuracy. We demonstrate how Manhattan-like plots and moving averages of Iam and hiQ can be useful to identify regions enriched with less accurate imputed markers, whereas these regions would by missed when applying the accuracy measure info (implemented in IMPUTE2). CONCLUSION: We recommend using Iam hiQ additional to other accuracy scores for variant filtering before stepping into the analysis of imputed GWAS data. Albert Rosenberger, Viola Tozzi, Heike Bickeböller, Rayjean J. Hung, David C. Christiani, Neil E. Caporaso, Geoffrey Liu, Stig E. Bojesen, Loic Le Marchand, Demetrios Albanes, Melinda Aldrich, Adonina Tardon, Guillermo Fernández-Tardón, Gad Rennert, John K. Field, Triantafillos Liloglou, Lambertus A. Kiemeney, Philip Lazarus, Aage Haugen, Shanbeh Zienolddiny, Stephen Lam, Matthew B. Schabath, Angeline S. Andrew, Eric J. Duell, Susanne M. Arnold, Hans Brunnström, Olle Melander, Gary E. Goodman, Chu Chen, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marion Dawn Teare, Angela Cox, Penella J. Woll, Angela Risch, Thomas R. Muley, Paul Brennan, Maria Teresa Landi, Sanjay Shete, Christopher I. Amos |
BMC Bioinform. | 40 |
| 2016 | Empirical estimation of sequencing error rates using smoothing splinesabstractBACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing has been used by investigators to address a diverse range of biological problems through, for example, polymorphism and mutation discovery and microRNA profiling. However, compared to conventional sequencing, the error rates for next-generation sequencing are often higher, which impacts the downstream genomic analysis. Recently, Wang et al. (BMC Bioinformatics 13:185, 2012) proposed a shadow regression approach to estimate the error rates for next-generation sequencing data based on the assumption of a linear relationship between the number of reads sequenced and the number of reads containing errors (denoted as shadows). However, this linear read-shadow relationship may not be appropriate for all types of sequence data. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the error rates in a more reliable way without assuming linearity. We proposed an empirical error rate estimation approach that employs cubic and robust smoothing splines to model the relationship between the number of reads sequenced and the number of shadows. RESULTS: We performed simulation studies using a frequency-based approach to generate the read and shadow counts directly, which can mimic the real sequence counts data structure. Using simulation, we investigated the performance of the proposed approach and compared it to that of shadow linear regression. The proposed approach provided more accurate error rate estimations than the shadow linear regression approach for all the scenarios tested. We also applied the proposed approach to assess the error rates for the sequence data from the MicroArray Quality Control project, a mutation screening study, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements project, and bacteriophage PhiX DNA samples. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed empirical error rate estimation approach does not assume a linear relationship between the error-free read and shadow counts and provides more accurate estimations of error rates for next-generation, short-read sequencing data. Sanjay Shete |
BMC Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2000 | Parallel Computation for Chromosome Reconstruction on a Cluster of WorkstationsabstractReconstructing a physical map of a chromosome from a genomic library presents a central computational problem in genetics. Physical map reconstruction in the presence of errors is a problem of high computational complexity which provides the motivation for parallel computing. Parallelization strategies for a maximum likelihood estimation-based approach to physical map reconstruction are presented. The estimation procedure entails gradient descent search for determining the optimal spacings between probes for a given probe ordering. The optimal probe ordering is determined using a stochastic optimization algorithm. A two-tier parallelization strategy is proposed wherein the gradient descent search is parallelized at the lower level and the stochastic optimization algorithm is simultaneously parallelized at the higher level. Implementation and experimental results on a distributed memory multiprocessor cluster running the Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM) environment are presented. Suchendra M. Bhandarkar, Salem Machaka, Sanjay Shete, Jonathan P. Arnold |
IPDPS | 3 |
| 2000 | Reconstructing distances in physical maps of chromosomes with nonoverlapping probesabstractWe present a new method for reconstructing the distances between probes in physical maps of chromosomes constructed by hybridizing pairs of clones under the so-called sampling-without-replacement protocol. In this protocol, which is simple, inexpensive, and has been used to successfully map several organisms, equal-length clones are hybridized against a clone-subset called the probes. The probes are chosen by a sequential process that is designed to generate a pairwise-nonoverlapping subset of the clones. We derive a likelihood function on probe spacings and orders for this protocol under a natural model of hybridization error, and describe how to reconstruct the most likely spacing for a given order under this objective using continuous optimization. The approach is tested on simulated data and real data from chromosome VI of Aspergillus nidulans. On simulated data we recover the true order and close to the true spacing; on the real data, for which the true order and spacing is unknown, we recover a probe order differing significantly from the published one. To our knowledge this is the first practical approach for computing a globally-optimal maximum-likelihood reconstruction of interprobe distances from clone-probe hybridization data. John D. Kececioglu, Sanjay Shete, Jonathan P. Arnold |
RECOMB | 2 |