We provide general criteria for the existence of minimal models of streaming transducers, namely devices that read an input word and produce an output value by iteratively updating an internal memory. This abstract model subsumes classical (sub)sequential transducers (Schützenberger), streaming string-to-string transducers (Alur-Černý), polynomial automata (Benedikt et al.), and variants of streaming string-to-tree transducers (Alur-D'Antoni). We then instantiate these criteria to obtain effective minimization results for variants of the latter model, where outputs are terms constructed incrementally by extending (tuples of) terms either at the leaves or at the roots.

A central goal of language theory is to compare formalisms by understanding both their expressive overlaps and their relative expressive power. One particularly challenging question in this direction is the problem of determining the common fragment of two formalisms F₁ and F₂, that is, effectively characterise the class F₁∩ F₂ of properties that can be expressed in both formalisms. This question can be equally phrased as a decision problem: given a property expressed in F₁ or F₂, decide whether the same property can be also expressed in F₁∩ F₂. A question closely related to this is the membership problem, denoted F₁ ↦ F₂, which asks whether a property expressed in F₁ can be also expressed in F₂. These problems become particularly difficult when branching-time formalisms are involved, in general due to the lack of equivalent algebraic characterizations. In this work, we prove that LTL ∩ PCTL is decidable, where PCTL denotes CTL extended with past operators. We do this by showing that both membership problems, LTL ↦ PCTL and PCTL ↦ LTL, are decidable. The direction PCTL ↦ LTL follows from suitable combinations of known results. The converse direction, LTL ↦ PCTL, requires an automata-theoretic characterisation of PCTL. Specifically, we introduce a new class of automata, called counter-free hesitant weak tree automata (HWT_cf) that capture precisely the expressiveness of PCTL, and that are obtained by combining two orthogonal restrictions on alternating parity tree automata, namely, counter-free hesitancy and weakness. We then prove that, for every word language L defined by an LTL formula, the associated tree language △[L] is recognisable by an HWT_cf if and only if L is recognized by a deterministic Büchi word automaton. Since the latter recognisability problem is known to be decidable, so is the former. This result advances the longstanding open problem of deciding LTL ∩ CTL. Indeed, that problem can now be reduced to PCTL ↦ CTL, that is, the question of when past operators can be eliminated.

A transducer is finite-valued if for some bound k, it maps any given input to at most k outputs. For classical, one-way transducers, it is known since the 80s that finite valuedness entails decidability of the equivalence problem. This decidability result is in contrast to the general case, which makes finite-valued transducers very attractive. For classical transducers it is also known that finite valuedness is decidable and that any k-valued finite transducer can be decomposed as a union of k single-valued finite transducers.

In this paper, we study the finite satisfiability problem for the logic BE under the homogeneity assumption. BE is the cornerstone of Halpern and Shoham’s interval temporal logic, and features modal operators corresponding to the prefix (a.k.a. "Begins") and suffix (a.k.a. "Ends") relations on intervals. In terms of complexity, BE lies in between the "Chop" logic C, whose satisfiability problem is known to be non-elementary, and the PSpace-complete interval logic D of the sub-interval (a.k.a. "During") relation. BE was shown to be ExpSpace-hard, and the only known satisfiability procedure is primitive recursive, but not elementary. Our contribution consists of tightening the complexity bounds of the satisfiability problem for BE, by proving it to be ExpSpace-complete. We do so by devising an equi-satisfiable normal form with boundedly many nested modalities. The normalization technique resembles Scott’s quantifier elimination, but it turns out to be much more involved due to the limitations enforced by the homogeneity assumption.

Abstract We study a variant of the classical membership problem in automata theory, which consists of deciding whether a given input word is accepted by a given automaton. We do so through the lenses of parameterized dynamic data structures: we assume that the automaton is fixed and its size is the parameter, while the input word is revealed as in a stream, one symbol at a time following the natural order on positions. The goal is to design a dynamic data structure that can be efficiently updated upon revealing the next symbol, while maintaining the answer to the query on whether the word consisting of symbols revealed so far is accepted by the automaton. We provide complexity bounds for this dynamic acceptance problem for timed automata that process symbols interleaved with time spans. The main contribution is a dynamic data structure that maintains acceptance of a fixed one-clock timed automaton $${\mathcal {A}}$$ A with amortized update time $$2^{{\mathcal {O}}(|{\mathcal {A}}|)}$$ 2 O ( | A | ) per input symbol.

Abstract The origin semantics for transducers was proposed in 2014, and it led to various characterizations and decidability results that are in contrast with the classical semantics. In this paper we add a further decidability result for characterizing transducers that are close to one-way transducers in the origin semantics. We show that it is decidable whether a non-deterministic two-way word transducer can be resynchronized by a bounded, regular resynchronizer into an origin-equivalent one-way transducer. The result is in contrast with the usual semantics, where it is undecidable to know if a non-deterministic two-way transducer is equivalent to some one-way transducer.

Ensuring the correctness of distributed cyber-physical systems can be done at runtime by monitoring properties over their behaviour. In a decentralised setting, such behaviour consists of multiple local traces, each offering an incomplete view of the system events to the local monitors, as opposed to the standard centralised setting with a unique global trace. We introduce the first monitoring framework for timed properties described by timed regular expressions over a distributed network of monitors. First, we define functions to rewrite expressions according to partial knowledge for both the centralised and decentralised cases. Then, we define decentralised algorithms for monitors to evaluate properties using these functions, as well as proofs of soundness and eventual completeness of said algorithms. Finally, we implement and evaluate our framework on synthetic timed regular expressions, giving insights on the cost of the centralised and decentralised settings and when to best use each of them.

We provide a wide-ranging study of the scenario where a subset of the relations in a relational vocabulary is visible to a user—that is, their complete contents are known—while the remaining relations are invisible. We also have a background theory—invariants given by logical sentences—that may relate the visible relations to invisible ones, and also may constrain both the visible and invisible relations in isolation. We want to determine whether some other information, given as a positive existential formula, can be inferred using only the visible information and the background theory. This formula whose inference we are concerned with is denoted as the query . We consider whether positive information about the query can be inferred, and also whether negative information—the sentence does not hold—can be inferred. We further consider both the instance-level version of the problem, where both the query and the visible instance are given, and the schema-level version, where we want to know whether truth or falsity of the query can be inferred in some instance of the schema.

In this paper we provide a positive answer to a question left open by Alur and and Deshmukh in 2011 by showing that equivalence of finite-valued copyless streaming string transducers is decidable.

We study two formalisms that allow to compare transducers over words under origin semantics: rational and regular resynchronizers, and show that the former are captured by the latter. We then consider some instances of the following synthesis problem: given transducers T_1,T_2, construct a rational (resp. regular) resynchronizer R, if it exists, such that T_1 is contained in R(T_2) under the origin semantics. We show that synthesis of rational resynchronizers is decidable for functional, and even finite-valued, one-way transducers, and undecidable for relational one-way transducers. In the two-way setting, synthesis of regular resynchronizers is shown to be decidable for unambiguous two-way transducers. For larger classes of two-way transducers, the decidability status is open.

Regular word transductions extend the robust notion of regular languages from a qualitative to a quantitative reasoning. They were already considered in early papers of formal language theory, but turned out to be much more challenging. The last decade brought considerable research around various transducer models, aiming to achieve similar robustness as for automata and languages. In this paper we survey some older and more recent results on string transducers. We present classical connections between automata, logic and algebra extended to transducers, some genuine definability questions, and review approaches to the equivalence problem.

We consider equivalence and containment problems for word transductions. These problems are known to be undecidable when the transductions are relations between words realized by non-deterministic transducers, and become decidable when restricting to functions from words to words. Here we prove that decidability can be equally recovered the origin semantics, that was introduced by Bojanczyk in 2014. We prove that the equivalence and containment problems for two-way word transducers in the origin semantics are PSPACE-complete. We also consider a variant of the containment problem where two-way transducers are compared under the origin semantics, but in a more relaxed way, by allowing distortions of the origins. The possible distortions are described by means of a resynchronization relation. We propose MSO-definable resynchronizers and show that they preserve the decidability of the containment problem under resynchronizations. {}

A natural approach to define binary word relations over a finite alphabet A is through two-tape finite state automata that recognize regular languages over {1, 2} x A, where (i,a) is interpreted as reading letter a from tape i. Accordingly, a word w in L denotes the pair (u_1,u_2) in A^* x A^* in which u_i is the projection of w onto i-labelled letters. While this formalism defines the well-studied class of Rational relations (a.k.a. non-deterministic finite state transducers), enforcing restrictions on the reading regime from the tapes, which we call synchronization, yields various sub-classes of relations. Such synchronization restrictions are imposed through regular properties on the projection of the language onto {1,2}. In this way, for each regular language C subseteq {1,2}^*, one obtains a class Rel({C}) of relations. Regular, Recognizable, and length-preserving rational relations are all examples of classes that can be defined in this way. We study the problem of containment for synchronized classes of relations: given C,D subseteq {1,2}^*, is Rel({C}) subseteq Rel({D})? We show a characterization in terms of C and D which gives a decidability procedure to test for class inclusion. This also yields a procedure to re-synchronize languages from {1, 2} x A preserving the denoted relation whenever the inclusion holds.

Abstract We develop an algebraic notion of recognizability for languages of words indexed by countable linear orderings. We prove that this notion is effectively equivalent to definability in monadic second-order (MSO) logic. We also provide three logical applications. First, we establish the first known collapse result for the quantifier alternation of MSO logic over countable linear orderings. Second, we solve an open problem posed by Gurevich and Rabinovich, concerning the MSO-definability of sets of rational numbers using the reals in the background. Third, we establish the MSO-definability of the set of yields induced by an MSO-definable set of trees, confirming a conjecture posed by Bruyère, Carton, and Sénizergues.

Functional transductions realized by two-way transducers (or, equally, by streaming transducers or MSO transductions) are the natural and standard notion of "regular" mappings from words to words. It was shown in 2013 that it is decidable if such a transduction can be implemented by some one-way transducer, but the given algorithm has non-elementary complexity. We provide an algorithm of different flavor solving the above question, that has doubly exponential space complexity. In the special case of sweeping transducers the complexity is one exponential less. We also show how to construct an equivalent one-way transducer, whenever it exists, in doubly or triply exponential time, again depending on whether the input transducer is sweeping or two-way. In the sweeping case our construction is shown to be optimal.

Functional transductions realized by two-way transducers (equivalently, by streaming transducers and by MSO transductions) are the natural and standard notion of “regular” mappings from words to words. It was shown recently (LICS'13) that it is decidable if such a transduction can be implemented by some one-way transducer, but the given algorithm has non-elementary complexity. We provide an algorithm of different flavor solving the above question, that has double exponential space complexity. We further apply our technique to decide whether the transduction realized by a two-way transducer can be implemented by a sweeping transducer, with either known or unknown number of passes.

We prove the following decomposition theorem: every 1-register streaming string transducer that associates a uniformly bounded number of outputs with each input can be effectively decomposed as a finite union of functional 1-register streaming string transducers. This theorem relies on a combinatorial result by Kortelainen concerning word equations with iterated factors. Our result implies the decidability of the equivalence problem for the considered class of transducers. This can be seen as a first step towards proving a more general decomposition theorem for streaming string transducers with multiple registers.

We consider minimization problems for natural parameters of word transducers: the number of passes performed by two-way transducers and the number of registers used by streaming transducers. We show how to compute in ExpSpace the minimum number of passes needed to implement a transduction given as sweeping transducer, and we provide effective constructions of transducers of (worst-case optimal) doubly exponential size. We then consider streaming transducers where concatenations of registers are forbidden in the register updates. Based on a correspondence between the number of passes of sweeping transducers and the number of registers of equivalent concatenation-free streaming transducers, we derive a minimization procedure for the number of registers of concatenation-free streaming transducers.

We provide a wide-ranging study of the scenario where a subset of the relations in the schema are visible --- that is, their complete contents are known --- while the remaining relations are invisible. We also have integrity constraints (invariants given by logical sentences) which may relate the visible relations to the invisible ones. We want to determine which information about a query (a positive existential sentence) can be inferred from the visible instance and the constraints. We consider both positive and negative query information, that is, whether the query or its negation holds. We consider the instance-level version of the problem, where both the query and the visible instance are given, as well as the schema-level version, where we want to know whether truth or falsity of the query can be inferred in some instance of the schema.

We study the problem of bounded repairability of a given restriction tree language R into a target tree language T . More precisely, we say that R is bounded repairable with respect to T if there exists a bound on the number of standard tree editing operations necessary to apply to any tree in R to obtain a tree in T . We consider a number of possible specifications for tree languages: bottom-up tree automata (on curry encoding of unranked trees) that capture the class of XML schemas and document type definitions (DTDs). We also consider a special case when the restriction language R is universal (i.e., contains all trees over a given alphabet). We give an effective characterization of bounded repairability between pairs of tree languages represented with automata. This characterization introduces two tools—synopsis trees and a coverage relation between them—allowing one to reason about tree languages that undergo a bounded number of editing operations. We then employ this characterization to provide upper bounds to the complexity of deciding bounded repairability and show that these bounds are tight. In particular, when the input tree languages are specified with arbitrary bottom-up automata, the problem is coNExp-complete. The problem remains coNExp-complete even if we use deterministic nonrecursive DTDs to specify the input languages. The complexity of the problem can be reduced if we assume that the alphabet, the set of node labels, is fixed: the problem becomes PS pace -complete for nonrecursive DTDs and coNP-complete for deterministic nonrecursive DTDs. Finally, when the restriction tree language R is universal, we show that the bounded repairability problem becomes E xp -complete if the target language is specified by an arbitrary bottom-up tree automaton and becomes tractable (P-complete, in fact) when a deterministic bottom-up automaton is used.

Two-way finite-state transducers on words are strictly more expressive than one-way transducers. It has been shown recently how to decide if a two-way functional transducer has an equivalent one-way transducer, and the complexity of the algorithm is non-elementary. We propose an alternative and simpler characterization for sweeping functional transducers, namely, for transducers that can only reverse their head direction at the extremities of the input. Our algorithm works in 2EXPSPACE and, in the positive case, produces an equivalent one-way transducer of doubly exponential size. We also show that the bound on the size of the transducer is tight, and that the one-way definability problem is undecidable for (sweeping) non-functional transducers.

Integrity constraint management concerns both checking whether data is valid and taking action to restore correctness when invalid data is discovered. In XML the notion of valid data can be captured by schema languages such as Document Type Definitions (DTDs) and more generally XML schemas. DTDs have the property that constraint checking can be done in streaming fashion. In this paper we consider when the corresponding action to restore validity -- repair -- can be done in streaming fashion. We formalize this as the problem of determining, given a DTD, whether or not a streaming procedure exists that transforms an input document so as to satisfy the DTD, using a number of edits independent of the document. We show that this problem is decidable. In fact, we show the decidability of a more general problem, allowing a more general class of schemas than DTDs, and requiring a repair procedure that works only for documents that are already known to satisfy another class of constraints. The decision procedure relies on a new analysis of the structure of DTDs, reducing to a novel notion of game played on pushdown systems associated with the schemas.

We consider the problem of repairing unranked trees (e.g., XML documents) satisfying a given restriction specification R (e.g., a DTD) into unranked trees satisfying a given target specification T. Specifically, we focus on the question of whether one can get from any tree in a regular language R to some tree in another regular language T with a finite, uniformly bounded, number of edit operations (i.e., deletions and insertions of nodes). We give effective characterizations of the pairs of specifications R and T for which such a uniform bound exists, and we study the complexity of the problem under different representations of the regular tree languages (e.g., non-deterministic stepwise automata, deterministic stepwise automata, DTDs). Finally, we point out some connections with the analogous problem for regular languages of words, which was previously studied in [6].

What do you do if a computational object (e.g. program trace) fails a specification? An obvious approach is to perform repair: modify the object minimally to get something that satisfies the constraints. In this paper we study repair of temporal constraints, given as automata or temporal logic formulas. We focus on determining the number of repairs that must be applied to a word satisfying a given input constraint in order to ensure that it satisfies a given target constraint. This number may well be unbounded; one of our main contributions is to isolate the complexity of the "bounded repair problem", based on a characterization of the pairs of regular languages that admit such a repair. We consider this in the setting where the repair strategy is unconstrained and also when the strategy is restricted to use finite memory. Although the streaming setting is quite different from the general setting, we find that there are surprising connections between streaming and non-streaming, as well as within variants of the streaming problem.

We investigate a higher-order query language that embeds operators of the positive relational algebra within the simply-typed λ-calculus. Our language allows one to succinctly define ordinary positive relational algebra queries (conjunctive queries and unions of conjunctive queries) and, in addition, second-order query functionals, which allow the transformation of CQs and UCQs in a generic (i.e., syntax-independent) way. We investigate the equivalence and containment problems for this calculus, which subsumes traditional CQ/UCQ containment. Query functionals are said to be equivalent if the output queries are equivalent, for each possible input query, and similarly for containment. These notions of containment and equivalence depend on the class of (ordinary relational algebra) queries considered. We show that containment and equivalence are decidable when query variables are restricted to positive relational algebra and we identify the precise complexity of the problem. We also identify classes of functionals where containment is tractable. Finally, we provide upper bounds to the complexity of the containment problem when functionals act over other classes.

In this paper, we focus our attention on the interval temporal logic of the Allen's relations ``meets'', ``begins'', and ``begun by'' ($\ABB$ for short), interpreted over natural numbers. We first introduce the logic and we show that it is expressive enough to model distinctive interval properties, such as accomplishment conditions, to capture basic modalities of point-based temporal logic, such as the until operator, and to encode relevant metric constraints. Then, we prove that the satisfiability problem for $\ABB$ over natural numbers is decidable by providing a small model theorem based on an original contraction method. Finally, we prove the EXPSPACE-completeness of the problem.

In this paper we generalize the contraction method, originally proposed by Elgot and Rabin and later extended by Carton and Thomas, from labeled linear orderings to colored deterministic trees. The method we propose rests on a suitable notion of indistinguishability of trees with respect to tree automata that allows us to reduce a number of instances of the acceptance problem for tree automata to decidable instances involving regular trees. We prove that such a method works effectively for a large class of trees, which is closed under noticeable operations and includes all the deterministic trees of the Caucal hierarchy obtained via unfoldings and inverse finite mappings as well as several trees outside such a hierarchy.

A time granularity can be viewed as the partitioning of a temporal domain in groups of elements, where each group is perceived as an indivisible unit. In this paper we explore an automaton-based approach to the management of time granularity that compactly represents time granularities as single-string automata with counters, that is, Buchi automata, extended with counters, that accept a single infinite word. We focus our attention on the equivalence problem for the class of restricted labeled single-string automata (RLA for short). The equivalence problem for RLA is the problem of establishing whether two given RLA represent the same time granularity. The main contribution of the paper is the reduction of the (non-)equivalence problem for RLA to the satisfiability problem for linear diophantine equations with bounds on variables. Since the latter problem has been shown to be NP-complete, we have that the RLA equivalence problem is in co-NP.

In this paper, we address the decision problem for a system of monadic second-order logic interpreted over an /spl omega/-layered temporal structure devoid of both a finest layer and a coarsest one (we call such a structure totally unbounded). We propose an automaton-theoretic method that solves the problem in two steps: first, we reduce the considered problem to the problem of determining, for any given Rabin tree automaton, whether it accepts a fixed vertex-colored tree; then, we exploit a suitable notion of tree equivalence to reduce the latter problem to the decidable case of regular trees.