Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven A. Borbash

dblp:37/4905 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Wireless networking · 59% Network optimization and economics · 36% Physical-layer communications · 5%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking
link scheduling
0.122006
Wireless Link Scheduling With Power Control and SINR Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Network optimization and economics
network optimization
0.122006
Wireless Link Scheduling With Power Control and SINR Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Wireless networking › link scheduling
SINR-based scheduling
0.112006
Wireless Link Scheduling With Power Control and SINR Constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks
0.012006
The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Physical-layer communications
SINR constraints
0.012006
The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

power control · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 An asynchronous neighbor discovery algorithm for wireless sensor networks
Steven A. Borbash, Anthony Ephremides, Michael J. McGlynn
Ad Hoc Networks1
2006 The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network
abstract
The problem of determining what links can be simultaneously activated in a wireless network such that a signal-to-interference-and-noise (SINR) constraint is satisfied at all receivers is considered. The term "feasible matching" is introduced to describe a set of (transmitter, receiver) pairs for which there exists some set of transmit powers which can simultaneously meet the SINR requirements at the receivers. Given disjoint equally sized sets of transmitters and receivers, it is shown that when the SINR requirement at the receivers is greater than 1, no more than one feasible matching between the transmitters and the receivers exists. Sufficient conditions are provided under which certain broad classes of matchings in a network are guaranteed to be feasible; for example all matchings involving k or fewer links. The application of these results to ad hoc wireless networks and to scheduling is discussed.
Steven A. Borbash, Anthony Ephremides
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2006 Wireless Link Scheduling With Power Control and SINR Constraints
abstract
The problem of determining a minimal length schedule to satisfy given link demands in a wireless network is considered. Links are allowed to be simultaneously active if no node can simultaneously transmit and receive, no node can transmit to or receive from more than one node at a time, and a given signal-to-interference and noise ratio (SINR) is exceeded at each receiver when transmitters use optimally chosen transmit powers. We show that a) the general problem is at least as hard as the MAX-SIR-MATCHING problem, which is easier to describe and b) when the demands have a superincreasing property the problem is tractable.
Steven A. Borbash, Anthony Ephremides
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2004 The feasibility of matchings in a wireless network
abstract
Scheduling is important in wireless networks for two reasons. First, a schedule of minimum length provides an upper bound on the network's throughput. Second, scheduling is necessary to avoid collisions. Collisions cost energy, making them undesirable in wireless networks whose nodes have limited energy. To produce good link schedules we need large activation sets, sets of links, which can be used concurrently. We call these "feasible matchings". The larger a matching, greater is the parallelism, and the shorter the schedule. In this work, we prove theorems that show how to infer whether certain sets of links are feasible or not, without actually computing eigenvalues.
Steven A. Borbash, Anthony Ephremides
ISIT1
2001 Birthday protocols for low energy deployment and flexible neighbor discovery in ad hoc wireless networks
abstract
In this paper, we address two problems associated with static ad hoc wireless networks; methods of saving energy during a deployment of the nodes, and efficient methods of performing adjacent neighbor discovery. To meet these goals we introduce a family of "birthday protocols"which use random independent transmissions to discover adjacent nodes. Various modes of the birthday protocol are used to solve the two problems. We provide a mathematical model and analysis of two modes of the protocol and are led to a third mode which is the probabilistic analog of the deterministic round robin scheduling algorithm. We show by analysis and simulation that the birthday protocols are a promising tool for saving energy during the deployment of an ad hoc network as well as an efficient and flexible means of having the nodes discover their neighbors
Michael J. McGlynn, Steven A. Borbash
MobiHoc2