EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. Bharat Rao
dblp:37/5337 · also Bharat Rao
· DBLP profile ↗
47ranked-venue papers
11as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 32 · 9 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 16 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 9 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
16 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 60% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11% Language models and text generation · 6% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
10 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 76% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 22% Computational science and engineering · 2% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers |
Data mining · 95% Machine learning and data management · 5% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 74% Algorithms and data structures · 26% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 61, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › label-efficient federated learning
federated semi-supervised learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.2 | 3 | 2007 | Automated Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection from Ultrasound Images Using Bayesian Networks · IJCAI 2007 A Theoretical Framework for Learning Bayesian Networks with Parameter Inequality Constraints · IJCAI 2007 Bayesian Network Learning with Parameter Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Medical and health informatics
computer-aided diagnosis |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | LungCAD: a clinically approved, machine learning system for lung cancer detection · KDD 2007 Multiple Instance Learning for Computer Aided Diagnosis · NIPS 2006 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Feature Selection and Kernel Design via Linear Programming · IJCAI 2007 Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiers · KDD 2006 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Rule extraction from linear support vector machines · KDD 2005 Semi-Supervised Mixture of Kernels via LPBoost Methods · ICDM 2005 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › large margin methods
maximum margin classifiers |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Using Local Dependencies within Batches to Improve Large Margin Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2009 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
inductive transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Bayesian multiple instance learning: automatic feature selection and inductive transfer · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Bayesian multiple instance learning: automatic feature selection and inductive transfer · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › sparse kernel methods
sparse kernel learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning Sparse Kernels from 3D Surfaces for Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection · AAAI 2008 |
Medical and health informatics › cardiac image analysis
cardiac motion analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning Sparse Kernels from 3D Surfaces for Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection · AAAI 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › survival analysis
cox regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Privacy-preserving cox regression for survival analysis · KDD 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Privacy-preserving cox regression for survival analysis · KDD 2008 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data analysis
privacy-preserving data mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Privacy-preserving cox regression for survival analysis · KDD 2008 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › limited supervision › multi-view semi-supervised learning
co-training |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Bayesian Co-Training · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
kernel design |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Feature Selection and Kernel Design via Linear Programming · IJCAI 2007 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Feature Selection and Kernel Design via Linear Programming · IJCAI 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › medical image analysis
medical image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | LungCAD: a clinically approved, machine learning system for lung cancer detection · KDD 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multi-view learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Bayesian Co-Training · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Bayesian Co-Training · NIPS 2007 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | A Theoretical Framework for Learning Bayesian Networks with Parameter Inequality Constraints · IJCAI 2007 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Automated Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection from Ultrasound Images Using Bayesian Networks · IJCAI 2007 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Feature Selection and Kernel Design via Linear Programming · IJCAI 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint satisfaction
constraint learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Bayesian Network Learning with Parameter Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Bayesian Network Learning with Parameter Constraints · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2006 |
Medical and health informatics › computer-aided diagnosis
computer-aided detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiers · KDD 2006 |
Medical and health informatics › computer-aided diagnosis
lung nodule detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiers · KDD 2006 |
Medical and health informatics › computational pathology
multiple instance learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Multiple Instance Learning for Computer Aided Diagnosis · NIPS 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rule ensembles · 0.9random forest · 0.9pseudo-labeling · 0.9gradient-boosted decision trees · 0.9co-training · 0.9linear programming · 0.3sparse coding · 0.2kernel methods · 0.2feature selection · 0.2dimensionality reduction · 0.2machine learning · 0.1classification · 0.1cascade classification · 0.1boosting · 0.1bayesian network · 0.1local dependencies · 0.1large margin classifier · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Little Is Enough: Boosting Privacy by Sharing Only Hard Labels in Federated Semi-Supervised LearningabstractIn many critical applications, sensitive data is inherently distributed and cannot be centralized due to privacy concerns. A wide range of federated learning approaches have been proposed to train models locally at each client without sharing their sensitive data, typically by exchanging model parameters, or probabilistic predictions (soft labels) on a public dataset or a combination of both. However, these methods still disclose private information and restrict local models to those that can be trained using gradient-based methods. We propose a federated co-training (FEDCT) approach that improves privacy by sharing only definitive (hard) labels on a public unlabeled dataset. Clients use a consensus of these shared labels as pseudo-labels for local training. This federated co-training approach empirically enhances privacy without compromising model quality. In addition, it allows the use of local models that are not suitable for parameter aggregation in traditional federated learning, such as gradient-boosted decision trees, rule ensembles, and random forests. Furthermore, we observe that FEDCT performs effectively in federated fine-tuning of large language models, where its pseudo-labeling mechanism is particularly beneficial. Empirical evaluations and theoretical analyses suggest its applicability across a range of federated learning scenarios. Amr Abourayya, Jens Kleesiek, Kanishka Rao, Erman Ayday, R. Bharat Rao, Geoffrey I. Webb, Michael Kamp |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2013 | The role of medical data analytics in reducing health fraud and improving clinical and financial outcomesabstractConsider the following healthcare trends: (1) There is a tremendous increase in the amount of patient, life sciences and process data in electronic form, fueled by advances in healthcare IT technology, and health reform legislation. (2) The amount of medical information (e.g., evidence-based knowledge) and published knowledge is said to be doubling every few years. (3) There is an explosion in the number of available therapies and diagnostic options for patient care, often enabling precise targeting of therapy to disease conditions. In this talk we will discuss these trends and some of the reasons why, despite these advances, healthcare is facing a crisis: namely, there is a steady unsustainable increase in medical costs without a corresponding improvement of patient outcomes. We believe that analysis of clinical, life sciences and medical process data can play a key role in tackling these fundamental challenges. Two technology advances, in particular, can play a key role: cloud computing and mobility will make it possible to analyze vast amounts of data and quickly deliver useful information to clinicians, consumers and researchers at the point where it can have the most impact. Some of this is already happening today, with medical records being analyzed to reduce fraud, waste and abuse, improve patient outcomes, and to improve compliance with standards of care and policy guidelines. We conclude the talk with a glimpse of a future where medical systems could be continually analyzed for optimizing healthcare costs and outcomes. R. Bharat Rao |
CBMS | 1 |
| 2011 | Bayesian Co-Training
Shipeng Yu, Balaji Krishnapuram, Rómer Rosales, R. Bharat Rao |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2010 | Guest Editorial: Special Issue on impacting patient care by mining medical data
Rómer Rosales, R. Bharat Rao |
Data Min. Knowl. Discov. | 2 |
| 2009 | Data-Efficient Information-Theoretic Test Selection
Marianne Mueller, Rómer Rosales, Harald Steck, Sriram Krishnan, R. Bharat Rao, Stefan Kramer 0001 |
AIME | 5 |
| 2009 | Subgroup Discovery for Test Selection: A Novel Approach and Its Application to Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Marianne Mueller, Rómer Rosales, Harald Steck, Sriram Krishnan, R. Bharat Rao, Stefan Kramer 0001 |
IDA | 5 |
| 2009 | Using Local Dependencies within Batches to Improve Large Margin Classifiers
Volkan Vural, Glenn Fung, Balaji Krishnapuram, Jennifer G. Dy, R. Bharat Rao |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 5 |
| 2008 | Learning Sparse Kernels from 3D Surfaces for Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection
Glenn Fung, Sriram Krishnan, R. Bharat Rao |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2008 | Bayesian multiple instance learning: automatic feature selection and inductive transferabstractWe propose a novel Bayesian multiple instance learning (MIL) algorithm. This algorithm automatically identifies the relevant feature subset, and utilizes inductive transfer when learning multiple (conceptually related) classifiers. Experimental results indicate that the proposed MIL method is more accurate than previous MIL algorithms and selects a much smaller set of useful features. Inductive transfer further improves the accuracy of the classifier as compared to learning each task individually. Vikas C. Raykar, Balaji Krishnapuram, Jinbo Bi, Murat Dundar, R. Bharat Rao |
ICML | 5 |
| 2008 | Privacy-preserving cox regression for survival analysisabstractPrivacy-preserving data mining (PPDM) is an emergent research area that addresses the incorporation of privacy preserving concerns to data mining techniques. In this paper we propose a privacy-preserving (PP) Cox model for survival analysis, and consider a real clinical setting where the data is horizontally distributed among different institutions. The proposed model is based on linearly projecting the data to a lower dimensional space through an optimal mapping obtained by solving a linear programming problem. Our approach differs from the commonly used random projection approach since it instead finds a projection that is optimal at preserving the properties of the data that are important for the specific problem at hand. Since our proposed approach produces an sparse mapping, it also generates a PP mapping that not only projects the data to a lower dimensional space but it also depends on a smaller subset of the original features (it provides explicit feature selection). Real data from several European healthcare institutions are used to test our model for survival prediction of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. These results are also confirmed using publicly available benchmark datasets. Our experimental results show that we are able to achieve a near-optimal performance without directly sharing the data across different data sources. This model makes it possible to conduct large-scale multi-centric survival analysis without violating privacy-preserving requirements. Shipeng Yu, Glenn Fung, Rómer Rosales, Sriram Krishnan, R. Bharat Rao, Cary Dehing-Oberije, Philippe Lambin |
KDD | 5 |
| 2008 | An Improved Multi-task Learning Approach with Applications in Medical Diagnosis
Jinbo Bi, Shipeng Yu, Murat Dundar, R. Bharat Rao |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 5 |
| 2008 | On the Dangers of Cross-Validation. An Experimental EvaluationabstractCross validation allows models to be tested using the full training set by means of repeated resampling; thus, maximizing the total number of points used for testing and potentially, helping to protect against overfitting. Improvements in computational power, recent reductions in the (computational) cost of classification algorithms, and the development of closed-form solutions (for performing cross validation in certain classes of learning algorithms) makes it possible to test thousand or millions of variants of learning models on the data. Thus, it is now possible to calculate cross validation performance on a much larger number of tuned models than would have been possible otherwise. However, we empirically show how under such large number of models the risk for overfitting increases and the performance estimated by cross validation is no longer an effective estimate of generalization; hence, this paper provides an empirical reminder of the dangers of cross validation. We use a closed-form solution that makes this evaluation possible for the cross validation problem of interest. In addition, through extensive experiments we expose and discuss the effects of the overuse/misuse of cross validation in various aspects, including model selection, feature selection, and data dimensionality. This is illustrated on synthetic, benchmark, and real-world data sets. R. Bharat Rao, Glenn Fung |
SDM | 1 |
| 2007 | Modeling the fMRI Signal via Hierarchical Clustered Hidden Process Models
Radu Stefan Niculescu, Tom M. Mitchell, R. Bharat Rao |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2007 | Reducing a Biomarkers List via Mathematical Programming: Application to Gene Signatures to Detect Time-Dependent Hypoxia in CancerabstractIn biology and medical sciences, highly parallel biological assays spurred a revolution leading to the emergence of the '-omics' era. Dimensionality reduction techniques are necessary to be able to analyze, interpret, validate and take advantage of the tremendous wealth of highly dimensional data they provide. This paper is based on a DNA microarray study providing gene signatures for hypoxia. These gene signatures were tested on a large breast cancer data set for assessing their prognostic power by means of Kaplan-Meier survival, univariate, and multivariate analyses. We explore the use of several mathematical programming-based techniques that aim to reduce the gene signature sizes as much as possible while maintaining the key characteristics of the original signature, more precisely: the signature prognostic and diagnostic significance. The proposed signature reduction techniques have very interesting potential uses. Indeed, by downsizing the relevant data to a manageable size, one can then patent the core set of biomarkers and also create a dedicated assay (e.g.: on a customized array) for routine applications (e.g.: in the clinical set up) leading to individualized medicine capabilities. Our experiments show that the reduced hypoxia signatures reproduced qualitatively and quantitatively in a similar way that of the original ones. Glenn Fung, Renaud Seigneuric, Sriram Krishnan, R. Bharat Rao, Bradly G. Wouters, Philippe Lambin |
ICMLA | 4 |
| 2007 | Semi-Supervised Active Learning for Modeling Medical Concepts from Free TextabstractWe apply a new active learning formulation to the problem of learning medical concepts from unstructured text. The new formulation is based on maximizing the mutual information that a sample labeling provides about the retrieval/classification model. This methodology is related to and extends the Query-by-Committee approach (QBC) (Seung et al., 1992) by exploiting unlabeled data in novel ways, beyond their common use only as potential query points. Unlike QBC, this method allows us to employ unlabeled data in addition to labeled data in order to select more appropriate samples for labeling. The samples thus chosen are both informative and also relevant according to a distribution of interest. This flexibility allows us to also tailor the model to arbitrary distributions relevant to the task at hand, in particular to the distribution of the test data. This formulation has implications in scenarios where the training and test distributions are different, or when a general model is adapted to a more specific model. Experiments were conducted to evaluate retrieval performance of natural-language text associated to various concepts of interest in the medical domain. We demonstrate the advantages of our formulation compared with QBC, the state-of-the art active learning approach, and against random sample selection. Rómer Rosales, Praveen Krishnamurthy, R. Bharat Rao |
ICMLA | 3 |
| 2007 | Automatic medical coding of patient records via weighted ridge regressionabstractIn this paper, we apply weighted ridge regression to tackle the highly unbalanced data issue in automatic large-scale ICD-9 coding of medical patient records. Since most of the ICD-9 codes are unevenly represented in the medical records, a weighted scheme is employed to balance positive and negative examples. The weights turn out to be associated with the instance priors from a probabilistic interpretation, and an efficient EM algorithm is developed to automatically update both the weights and the regularization parameter. Experiments on a large-scale real patient database suggest that the weighted ridge regression outperforms the conventional ridge regression and linear support vector machines (SVM). Jianwu Xu, Shipeng Yu, Jinbo Bi, Lucian Vlad Lita, Radu Stefan Niculescu, R. Bharat Rao |
ICMLA | 6 |
| 2007 | Learning Classifiers When the Training Data Is Not IID
Murat Dundar, Balaji Krishnapuram, Jinbo Bi, R. Bharat Rao |
IJCAI | 4 |
| 2007 | Feature Selection and Kernel Design via Linear Programming
Glenn Fung, Rómer Rosales, R. Bharat Rao |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2007 | A Theoretical Framework for Learning Bayesian Networks with Parameter Inequality Constraints
Radu Stefan Niculescu, Tom M. Mitchell, R. Bharat Rao |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2007 | Automated Heart Wall Motion Abnormality Detection from Ultrasound Images Using Bayesian Networks
Maleeha Qazi, Glenn Fung, Sriram Krishnan, Rómer Rosales, Harald Steck, R. Bharat Rao, Don Poldermans, Dhanalakshmi Chandrasekaran |
IJCAI | 6 |
| 2007 | LungCAD: a clinically approved, machine learning system for lung cancer detectionabstractWe present LungCAD, a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system that employs a classification algorithm for detecting solid pulmonary nodules from CT thorax studies. We briefly describe some of the machine learning techniques developed to overcome the real world challenges in this medical domain. The most significant hurdle in transitioning from a machine learning research prototype that performs well on an in-house dataset into a clinically deployable system, is the requirement that the CAD system be tested in a clinical trial. We describe the clinical trial in which LungCAD was tested: a large scale multi-reader, multi-case (MRMC) retrospective observational study to evaluate the effect of CAD in clinical practice for detecting solid pulmonary nodules from CT thorax studies. The clinical trial demonstrates that every radiologist that participated in the trial had a significantly greater accuracy with LungCAD, both for detecting nodules and identifying potentially actionable nodules; this, along with other findings from the trial, has resulted in FDA approval for LungCAD in late 2006. R. Bharat Rao, Jinbo Bi, Glenn Fung, Marcos Salganicoff, Nancy Obuchowski, David P. Naidich |
KDD | 1 |
| 2007 | Bayesian Co-TrainingabstractWe propose a Bayesian undirected graphical model for co-training, or more generally for semi-supervised multi-view learning. This makes explicit the previously unstated assumptions of a large class of co-training type algorithms, and also clarifies the circumstances under which these assumptions fail. Building upon new insights from this model, we propose an improved method for co-training, which is a novel co-training kernel for Gaussian process classifiers. The resulting approach is convex and avoids local-maxima problems, unlike some previous multi-view learning methods. Furthermore, it can automatically estimate how much each view should be trusted, and thus accommodate noisy or unreliable views. Experiments on toy data and real world data sets illustrate the benefits of this approach. Shipeng Yu, Balaji Krishnapuram, Rómer Rosales, Harald Steck, R. Bharat Rao |
NIPS | 5 |
| 2007 | Probabilistic Joint Feature Selection for Multi-task LearningabstractWe study the joint feature selection problem when learning multiple related classification or regression tasks. By imposing an automatic relevance determination prior on the hypothesis classes associated with each of the tasks and regularizing the variance of the hypothesis parameters, similar feature patterns across different tasks are encouraged and features that are relevant to all (or most) of the tasks are identified. Our analysis shows that the proposed probabilistic framework can be seen as a generalization of previous result from adaptive ridge regression to the multi-task learning setting. We provide a detailed description of the proposed algorithms for simultaneous model construction and justify the proposed algorithms in several aspects. Our experimental results show that this approach outperforms a regularized multi-task learning approach and the traditional methods where individual tasks are solved independently on synthetic data and the real-world data sets for lung cancer prognosis. Jinbo Bi, R. Bharat Rao, Vladimir Cherkassky |
SDM | 3 |
| 2006 | Batch Classification with Applications in Computer Aided Diagnosis
Volkan Vural, Glenn Fung, Balaji Krishnapuram, Jennifer G. Dy, R. Bharat Rao |
ECML | 5 |
| 2006 | Computer aided detection via asymmetric cascade of sparse hyperplane classifiersabstractThis paper describes a novel classification method for computer aided detection (CAD) that identifies structures of interest from medical images. CAD problems are challenging largely due to the following three characteristics. Typical CAD training data sets are large and extremely unbalanced between positive and negative classes. When searching for descriptive features, researchers often deploy a large set of experimental features, which consequently introduces irrelevant and redundant features. Finally, a CAD system has to satisfy stringent real-time requirements.This work is distinguished by three key contributions. The first is a cascade classification approach which is able to tackle all the above difficulties in a unified framework by employing an asymmetric cascade of sparse classifiers each trained to achieve high detection sensitivity and satisfactory false positive rates. The second is the incorporation of feature computational costs in a linear program formulation that allows the feature selection process to take into account different evaluation costs of various features. The third is a boosting algorithm derived from column generation optimization to effectively solve the proposed cascade linear programs.We apply the proposed approach to the problem of detecting lung nodules from helical multi-slice CT images. Our approach demonstrates superior performance in comparison against support vector machines, linear discriminant analysis and cascade AdaBoost. Especially, the resulting detection system is significantly sped up with our approach. Jinbo Bi, Senthil Periaswamy, Kazunori Okada, Toshiro Kubota, Glenn Fung, Marcos Salganicoff, R. Bharat Rao |
KDD | 7 |
| 2006 | Multiple Instance Learning for Computer Aided DiagnosisabstractMany computer aided diagnosis (CAD) problems can be best modelled as a multiple-instance learning (MIL) problem with unbalanced data: i.e. , the training data typically consists of a few positive bags, and a very large number of negative instances. Existing MIL algorithms are much too computationally expensive for these datasets. We describe CH, a framework for learning a Convex Hull representation of multiple instances that is significantly faster than existing MIL algorithms. Our CH framework applies to any standard hyperplane-based learning algorithm, and for some algorithms, is guaranteed to find the global optimal solution. Experimental studies on two different CAD applications further demonstrate that the proposed algorithm significantly improves diagnostic accuracy when compared to both MIL and traditional classifiers. Although not designed for standard MIL problems (which have both positive and negative bags and relatively balanced datasets), comparisons against other MIL methods on benchmark problems also indicate that the proposed method is competitive with the state-of-the-art. Glenn Fung, Murat Dundar, Balaji Krishnapuram, R. Bharat Rao |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2006 | Bayesian Network Learning with Parameter ConstraintsabstractThe task of learning models for many real-world problems requires incorporating domain knowledge into learning algorithms, to enable accurate learning from a realistic volume of training data. This paper considers a variety of types of domain knowledge for constraining parameter estimates when learning Bayesian networks. In particular, we consider domain knowledge that constrains the values or relationships among subsets of parameters in a Bayesian network with known structure. We incorporate a wide variety of parameter constraints into learning procedures for Bayesian networks, by formulating this task as a constrained optimization problem. The assumptions made in module networks, dynamic Bayes nets and context specific independence models can be viewed as particular cases of such parameter constraints. We present closed form solutions or fast iterative algorithms for estimating parameters subject to several specific classes of parameter constraints, including equalities and inequalities among parameters, constraints on individual parameters, and constraints on sums and ratios of parameters, for discrete and continuous variables. Our methods cover learning from both frequentist and Bayesian points of view, from both complete and incomplete data. We present formal guarantees for our estimators, as well as methods for automatically learning useful parameter constraints from data. To validate our approach, we apply it to the domain of fMRI brain image analysis. Here we demonstrate the ability of our system to first learn useful relationships among parameters, and then to use them to constrain the training of the Bayesian network, resulting in improved cross-validated accuracy of the learned model. Experiments on synthetic data are also presented. Radu Stefan Niculescu, Tom M. Mitchell, R. Bharat Rao |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2005 | Semi-Supervised Mixture of Kernels via LPBoost MethodsabstractWe propose an algorithm to construct classification models with a mixture of kernels from labeled and unlabeled data. The derived classifier is a mixture of models, each based on one kernel choice from a library of kernels. The sparse-favoring 1-norm regularization method is employed to restrict the complexity of mixture models and to achieve the sparsity of solutions. By modifying the column generation boosting algorithm LPBoost to a more general linear programming formulation, we are able to efficiently solve mixture-of-kernel problems and automatically select kernel basis functions centered at labeled data as well as unlabeled data. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is proved by experimental results on benchmark datasets. Jinbo Bi, Glenn Fung, Murat Dundar, R. Bharat Rao |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2005 | Sparse classifiers for Automated HeartWall Motion Abnormality DetectionabstractCoronary Heart Disease is the single leading cause of death world-wide, with lack of early diagnosis being a key contributory factor. This disease can be diagnosed by measuring and scoring regional motion of the heart wall in echocardiography images of the left ventricle (LV) of the heart. We describe a completely automated and robust technique that detects diseased hearts based on automatic detection and tracking of the endocardium and epicardium of the LV. We describe a novel feature selection technique based on mathematical programming that results in a robust hyperplane-based classifier. The classifier depends only on a small subset of numerical feature extracted from dualcontours tracked through time. We verify the robustness of our system on echocardiograms collected in routine clinical practice at one hospital, both with the standard crossvalidation analysis, and then on a held-out set of completely unseen echocardiography images. Glenn Fung, Maleeha Qazi, Sriram Krishnan, Jinbo Bi, R. Bharat Rao, A. Katz |
ICMLA | 5 |
| 2005 | Rule extraction from linear support vector machinesabstractWe describe an algorithm for converting linear support vector machines and any other arbitrary hyperplane-based linear classifiers into a set of non-overlapping rules that, unlike the original classifier, can be easily interpreted by humans. Each iteration of the rule extraction algorithm is formulated as a constrained optimization problem that is computationally inexpensive to solve. We discuss various properties of the algorithm and provide proof of convergence for two different optimization criteria We demonstrate the performance and the speed of the algorithm on linear classifiers learned from real-world datasets, including a medical dataset on detection of lung cancer from medical images. The ability to convert SVM's and other "black-box" classifiers into a set of human-understandable rules, is critical not only for physician acceptance, but also to reducing the regulatory barrier for medical-decision support systems based on such classifiers. Glenn Fung, Sathyakama Sandilya, R. Bharat Rao |
KDD | 3 |
| 2005 | Sparse Fisher Discriminant Analysis for Computer Aided DetectionabstractWe describe a method for sparse feature selection for a class of problems motivated by our work in Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) systems for identifying structures of interest in medical images. We propose a sparse formulation for Fisher Linear Discriminant (FLD) that scales well to large datasets; our method inherits all the desirable properties of FLD, while improving on handling large numbers of irrelevant and redundant features. We demonstrate that our sparse FLD formulation outperforms conventional FLD and two other methods for feature selection from the literature on both an artificial dataset and a real-world Colon CAD dataset. Murat Dundar, Glenn Fung, Jinbo Bi, Sathyakama Sandilya, R. Bharat Rao |
SDM | 5 |
| 2005 | Exploiting Parameter Related Domain Knowledge for Learning in Graphical ModelsabstractBuilding accurate models from a small amount of available training data can sometimes prove to be a great challenge. Expert domain knowledge can often be used to alleviate this burden. Parameter Sharing is one such important form of domain knowledge. Graphical models like HMMs, DBNs and Module Networks use different forms of Parameter Sharing to reduce the variance in the parameter estimates. The goal of this paper is to present a theoretical approach for learning in presence of several other types of Parameter Related Domain Knowledge that go beyond the ones in the above models. First, we introduce a General Parameter Sharing Framework that describes the models just mentioned, but allows for much finer grained parameter sharing assumptions. In this framework, we present sound procedures for parameter learning from both a Frequentist and a Bayesian point of view, from both complete and incomplete data, in the case where a domain expert specifies in advance the structure of the graphical model, and the subsets of parameters to be shared. Second, we describe a hierarchical extension of this framework based on Parameter Sharing Trees. Finally we present algorithms for using domain knowledge that specifies that certain groups of parameters share certain properties. In particular, we consider two kinds of constraints: first kind states certain groups of parameters share the same aggregate probability mass and second kind states the ratio of the parameters is preserved (shared) in several groups. As an example, we derive a novel form of parameter sharing for Bayesian Multinetworks. Radu Stefan Niculescu, Tom M. Mitchell, R. Bharat Rao |
SDM | 3 |
| 2004 | A fast iterative algorithm for fisher discriminant using heterogeneous kernelsabstractWe propose a fast iterative classification algorithm for Kernel Fisher Discriminant (KFD) using heterogeneous kernel models. In contrast with the standard KFD that requires the user to predefine a kernel function, we incorporate the task of choosing an appropriate kernel into the optimization problem to be solved. The choice of kernel is defined as a linear combination of kernels belonging to a potentially large family of different positive semidefinite kernels. The complexity of our algorithm does not increase significantly with respect to the number of kernels on the kernel family. Experiments on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that generalization performance of the proposed algorithm is not significantly different from that achieved by the standard KFD in which the kernel parameters have been tuned using cross validation. We also present results on a real-life colon cancer dataset that demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method. Glenn Fung, Murat Dundar, Jinbo Bi, R. Bharat Rao |
ICML | 4 |
| 2004 | Real-Time Multi-model Tracking of Myocardium in Echocardiography Using Robust Information Fusion
Bogdan Georgescu, Xiang Sean Zhou, Dorin Comaniciu, R. Bharat Rao |
MICCAI (2) | 4 |
| 2004 | Continuous-Time Bayesian Modeling of Clinical DataabstractInference from hospital patient records is difficult because data collection is done at arbitrary (not evenly-spaced) time intervals, and key clinical information is recorded only in unstructured form (as free text in doctors’ notes). We present REMIND, a framework for performing inference from patient records based upon continuous-time Markov models and Bayesian networks. We empirically justify the need for such a complex model. REMIND only uses easily-available domain knowledge which we obtain from physicians and medical literature, which may be inaccurate. We also demonstrate the robustness of our approach to parameter assignment. Sathyakama Sandilya, R. Bharat Rao |
SDM | 2 |
| 2003 | Evaluating the C-section Rate of Different Physician Practices: Using Machine Learning to Model Standard Practice
Rich Caruana, Radu Stefan Niculescu, R. Bharat Rao, Cynthia Simms |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2003 | Secure De-identification and Re-identification
William Landi, R. Bharat Rao |
AMIA | 2 |
| 2003 | Clinical and financial outcomes analysis with existing hospital patient recordsabstractExisting patient records are a valuable resource for automated outcomes analysis and knowledge discovery. However, key clinical data in these records is typically recorded in unstructured form as free text and images, and most structured clinical information is poorly organized. Time-consuming interpretation and analysis is required to convert these records into structured clinical data. Thus, only a tiny fraction of this resource is utilized. We present REMIND, a Bayesian Framework for Reliable Extraction and Meaningful Inference from Nonstructured Data. REMIND integrates and blends the structured and unstructured clinical data in patient records to automatically created high-quality structured clinical data. This structuring allows existing patient records to be mined for quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and to relate financial and clinical factors. We demonstrate REMIND on two medical applications: (a) Extract "recurrence", the key outcome for measuring treatment effectiveness, for colon cancer patients (ii) Extract key diagnoses and complications for acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) patients, and demonstrate the impact of these clinical factors on financial outcomes. R. Bharat Rao, Sathyakama Sandilya, Radu Stefan Niculescu, Colin Germond, Harsha Rao |
KDD | 1 |
| 2002 | Machine learning for sub-population assessment: evaluating the C-section rate of different physician practices
Rich Caruana, Radu Stefan Niculescu, R. Bharat Rao, Cynthia Simms |
AMIA | 3 |
| 2002 | Mining time-dependent patient outcomes from hospital patient records
R. Bharat Rao, Sathyakama Sandilya, Radu Stefan Niculescu, Colin Germond, Arun Goel |
AMIA | 1 |
| 1998 | Time Series Forecasting from High-Dimensional Data with Multiple Adaptive Layers
R. Bharat Rao, Scott T. Rickard, Frans Coetzee |
KDD | 1 |
| 1997 | CARDWATCH: a neural network based database mining system for credit card fraud detectionabstractCARDWATCH, a database mining system used for credit card fraud detection, is presented. The system is based on a neural network learning module, provides an interface to a variety of commercial databases and has a comfortable graphical user interface. Test results obtained for synthetically generated credit card data and an autoassociative neural network model show very successful fraud detection rates. Emin Aleskerov, Bernd Freisleben, R. Bharat Rao |
CIFEr | 3 |
| 1995 | For Every Generalization Action, Is There Really an Equal and Opposite Reaction?
R. Bharat Rao, Diana F. Spears, William M. Spears |
ICML | 1 |
| 1993 | Building Models to Support Synthesis in Early Stage Product Design
R. Bharat Rao, Stephen C. Y. Lu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1993 | Data Mining of Subjective Agricultural Data
R. Bharat Rao, Thomas B. Voigt, Thomas W. Fermanian |
ICML | 1 |
| 1992 | Learning Engineering Models with the Minimum Description Length Principle
R. Bharat Rao, Stephen C. Y. Lu |
AAAI | 1 |
| 1991 | Knowledge-Based Equation Discovery in Engineering Domains
R. Bharat Rao, Stephen C. Y. Lu, Robert E. Stepp |
ML | 1 |