Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ronghua Li 0002

dblp:37/548-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4496-8518ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 79% Privacy and data protection · 21%
Computer networks
2 papers
Network measurement and analytics · 62% Wireless sensing and localization · 31% Wireless networking · 7%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing
1.922026
Class-feature Watermark: A Resilient Black-box Watermark Against Model Extraction Attacks · AAAI 2026
"Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillation · ACL (1) 2025
Network measurement and analytics
device fingerprinting
1.012026
WiFinger: Fingerprinting Noisy IoT Event Traffic Using Packet-level Sequence Matching · NDSS 2026
Network measurement and analytics › traffic classification
traffic fingerprinting
1.012026
WiFinger: Fingerprinting Noisy IoT Event Traffic Using Packet-level Sequence Matching · NDSS 2026
Security and privacy of machine learning › model intellectual property protection
model watermarking
1.012026
Class-feature Watermark: A Resilient Black-box Watermark Against Model Extraction Attacks · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.912025
"Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillation · ACL (1) 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack
0.912025
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks? · ICML 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
0.912025
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks? · ICML 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
training-time attack
0.912025
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks? · ICML 2025
Wireless sensing and localization › indoor localization › fingerprint-based localization
RSS fingerprinting
0.812024
RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Privacy and data protection › online tracking
device tracking
0.812024
RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Privacy and data protection › location privacy
location privacy attack
0.812024
RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation
0.312025
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks? · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.312025
Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks? · ICML 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › model stealing
model stealing defense
0.312025
"Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillation · ACL (1) 2025
Wireless networking › WLAN
IEEE 802.11
0.212024
RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Wireless sensing and localization
received signal strength
0.212024
RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 3.3neural tangent kernel · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.7information theory · 1.7trajectory reconstruction · 1.5RSSI difference metric · 1.5sequence matching · 1.0decision boundary analysis · 1.0class-feature watermark · 1.0adversarial attack · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Class-feature Watermark: A Resilient Black-box Watermark Against Model Extraction Attacks
abstract
Machine learning models constitute valuable intellectual property, yet remain vulnerable to model extraction attacks (MEA), where adversaries replicate their functionality through black-box queries. Model watermarking counters MEAs by embedding forensic markers for ownership verification. Current black-box watermarks prioritize MEA survival through representation entanglement, yet inadequately explore resilience against sequential MEAs and removal attacks. Our study reveals that this risk is underestimated because existing removal methods are weakened by entanglement. To address this gap, we propose Watermark Removal attacK (WRK), which circumvents entanglement constraints by exploiting decision boundaries shaped by prevailing sample-level watermark artifacts. WRK effectively reduces watermark success rates by ≥88.79% across existing watermarking benchmarks. For robust protection, we propose Class-Feature Watermarks (CFW), which improve resilience by leveraging class-level artifacts. CFW constructs a synthetic class using out-of-domain samples, eliminating vulnerable decision boundaries between original domain samples and their artifact-modified counterparts (watermark samples). CFW concurrently optimizes both MEA transferability and post-MEA stability. Experiments across multiple domains show that CFW consistently outperforms prior methods in resilience, maintaining a watermark success rate of ≥70.15% in extracted models even under the combined MEA and WRK distortion, while preserving the utility of protected models.
Yaxin Xiao, Qingqing Ye 0001, Zi Liang, Haoyang Li 0018, Ronghua Li 0002, Huadi Zheng, Haibo Hu 0001
AAAI5
2026 WiFinger: Fingerprinting Noisy IoT Event Traffic Using Packet-level Sequence Matching
Ronghua Li 0002, Shinan Liu, Haibo Hu 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Nick Feamster
NDSS1
2025 "Yes, My LoRD." Guiding Language Model Extraction with Locality Reinforced Distillation
abstract
Zi Liang, Qingqing Ye, Yanyun Wang, Sen Zhang, Yaxin Xiao, RongHua Li, Jianliang Xu, Haibo Hu. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Zi Liang, Qingqing Ye 0001, Yanyun Wang 0003, Sen Zhang 0002, Yaxin Xiao, Ronghua Li 0002, Jianliang Xu, Haibo Hu 0001
ACL (1)6
2025 Does Low Rank Adaptation Lead to Lower Robustness against Training-Time Attacks?
abstract
Low rank adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a prominent technique for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) thanks to its superb efficiency gains over previous methods. While extensive studies have examined the performance and structural properties of LoRA, its behavior upon training-time attacks remain underexplored, posing significant security risks. In this paper, we theoretically investigate the security implications of LoRA's low-rank structure during fine-tuning, in the context of its robustness against data poisoning and backdoor attacks. We propose an analytical framework that models LoRA’s training dynamics, employs the neural tangent kernel to simplify the analysis of the training process, and applies information theory to establish connections between LoRA's low rank structure and its vulnerability against training-time attacks. Our analysis indicates that LoRA exhibits better robustness to backdoor attacks than full fine-tuning, while becomes more vulnerable to untargeted data poisoning due to its over-simplified information geometry. Extensive experimental evaluations have corroborated our theoretical findings.
Zi Liang, Haibo Hu 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001, Yaxin Xiao, Ronghua Li 0002
ICML5
2024 RFTrack: Stealthy Location Inference and Tracking Attack on Wi-Fi Devices
abstract
We present RFTrack, a new indoor location inference attack on Wi-Fi devices. This attack differs from existing Wi-Fi localization methods as it does not need bulky appliance deployment or inner physical access to the place of interest. RFTrack distinguishes itself by leveraging the temporal sequence of unlabeled Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) values to deduce location labels. To achieve this, we deploy a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent to model the most likely path of device movement and utilize these modeled trajectories to construct an RSSI fingerprint map. To enhance the accuracy of trajectory reconstruction, our technique exploits certain stationary Wi-Fi devices within the target area as reference points, facilitating the assessment of whether the mobile devices have traversed near specific zones with a newly proposed metric, the RSSI difference. The experimental results demonstrate that our system can accurately recover the trends of moving trajectories and successfully associate the unlabeled RSSI values with positions inside the place of interest to build a fingerprint map for real-time device tracking.
Ronghua Li 0002, Haibo Hu 0001, Qingqing Ye 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1