Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leo Budin

dblp:37/5745 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Memory systems · 48% Performance modeling and evaluation · 42% Distributed systems · 8%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling
0.031997
Analytical Prediction of Performance for Cache Coherence Protocols · IEEE Trans. Computers 1997
Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems · HPDC 1994
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model · HPDC 1993
Memory systems › cache coherence
cache coherence protocol
0.021997
Analytical Prediction of Performance for Cache Coherence Protocols · IEEE Trans. Computers 1997
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model · HPDC 1993
Memory systems › shared memory
distributed shared memory
0.021994
Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems · HPDC 1994
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model · HPDC 1993
Memory systems
cache coherence
0.021997
Analytical Prediction of Performance for Cache Coherence Protocols · IEEE Trans. Computers 1997
Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems · HPDC 1994
Distributed systems
consistency protocols
0.011994
Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems · HPDC 1994
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction
0.011994
Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems · HPDC 1994
Performance modeling and evaluation › cost modeling
communication cost modeling
0.011993
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model · HPDC 1993
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models
shared-memory parallelization
0.011993
Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model · HPDC 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

analytical modeling · 0.0simulation · 0.0steady-state analysis · 0.0state machine modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Genetic Programming Heuristics for Multiple Machine Scheduling
Domagoj Jakobovic, Leonardo Jelenkovic, Leo Budin
EuroGP3
2006 Dynamic Scheduling with Genetic Programming
Domagoj Jakobovic, Leo Budin
EuroGP2
2004 HEXAPOD Structure Evaluation as Web Service
Leonardo Jelenkovic, Domagoj Jakobovic, Leo Budin
ICINCO (2)3
1997 Analytical Prediction of Performance for Cache Coherence Protocols
abstract
In this paper, we introduce new analytical models for predicting the performance of parallel applications under various cache coherence protocol assumptions. The purpose of these models is to determine which protocols are to be used for which data blocks, and, in the case of dynamic protocols, also to determine when to change protocols. Although we focus on tightly-coupled multiprocessor systems, similar models can be derived for loosely-coupled distributed systems, such as networks of workstations. Our models are unique in that they lie between a large body of theoretical models that assume independence and a uniform distribution of memory accesses across processors, and a large body of address-trace oriented models that assume the availability of a precise characterization of interleaving behavior of memory accesses. The former are not very realistic, and the latter are not suitable for compile-time and run-time usage. In contrast, our models enable us to choose different input parameters depending on how the models will be used and depending on the needed accuracy in performance prediction. We present the models and show how the required parameters can be obtained. We assess the accuracy of our models on 15 parallel applications. For these applications, our most complete model predicts performance within a 10 percent margin when compared to a simulation of a sequentially consistent multiprocessor system. As part of this study, we also show the potential advantage of using dynamic hybrid protocols.
Sinisa Srbljic, Zvonko G. Vranesic, Michael Stumm, Leo Budin
IEEE Trans. Computers4
1994 Performance Prediction for Different Consistency Schemes in Distributed Shared Memory Systems
abstract
A model for predicting relative performance in distributed shared memory systems is presented. The model is intended for use with systems that feature adaptive consistency schemes. Based on estimated read/write access patterns, the model determines the average steady-state communication costs in the system, which serve as a performance indicator. The model is applied to data items which may be either compact data objects or objects consisting of smaller data elements. It is shown that the best results are attained when protocol selection is done at the level of data elements.>
Sinisa Srbljic, Zvonko G. Vranesic, Leo Budin
HPDC3
1993 Analytical Performance Evaluation of Data Replication Based Shared Memory Model
abstract
The proposed distributed shared memory model is based on a data replication scheme that provides an environment for a collection of processes that interact to solve a parallel programming problem. In the implementation of the scheme the authors suppose that the replicas of the shared data are present at each node and that an appropriate coherence protocol for maintaining the consistency among the replicas is applied. The performance of the distributed computation is very sensitive to the data-access behavior of the application and to the applied coherence protocol. Communication cost is regarded as an appropriate performance measure. Therefore, the authors first introduce a model characterizing the computation behavior with five workload parameters. Second, they formally describe the coherence protocols as cooperating state machines in order to evaluate their communication costs as functions of workload parameters.>
Sinisa Srbljic, Leo Budin
HPDC2