Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Massimo Sandal

dblp:37/7065 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0001-5633-3128ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-molecule analysis
0.012009
Hooke: an open software platform for force spectroscopy · Bioinform. 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
abstract
Wikipedia is the world's most successful online encyclopedia, now containing over 3.3 million English language articles. It is probably the largest collection of knowledge ever assembled, and is certainly the most widely accessible. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone with Internet access that chooses to, but does it provide reliable information? A 2005 study by Nature found that a selection of Wikipedia articles on scientific subjects were comparable to a professionally edited encyclopedia [1], suggesting a community of volunteers can generate and sustain surprisingly accurate content. For better or worse, people are guided to Wikipedia when searching the Web for biomedical information [2]. So there is an increasing need for the scientific community to engage with Wikipedia to ensure that the information it contains is accurate and current. For scientists, contributing to Wikipedia is an excellent way of fulfilling public engagement responsibilities and sharing expertise. For example, some Wikipedian scientists have successfully integrated biological data with Wikipedia to promote community annotation [3], [4]. This, in turn, encourages wider access to the linked data via Wikipedia. Others have used the wiki model to develop their own specialist, collaborative databases [5]–[8]. Taking your first steps into Wikipedia can be daunting, but here we provide some tips that should make the editing process go smoothly.
Darren W. Logan, Massimo Sandal, Paul P. Gardner, Magnus Manske, Alex Bateman
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2009 Hooke: an open software platform for force spectroscopy
abstract
SUMMARY: Hooke is an open source, extensible software intended for analysis of atomic force microscope (AFM)-based single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) data. We propose it as a platform on which published and new algorithms for SMFS analysis can be integrated in a standard, open fashion, as a general solution to the current lack of a standard software for SMFS data analysis. Specific features and support for file formats are coded as independent plugins. Any user can code new plugins, extending the software capabilities. Basic automated dataset filtering and semi-automatic analysis facilities are included. AVAILABILITY: Software and documentation are available at (http://code.google.com/p/hooke). Hooke is a free software under the GNU Lesser General Public License.
Massimo Sandal, Fabrizio Benedetti, Marco Brucale, Alberto Gomez-Casado, Bruno Samorì
Bioinform.1