Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott R. Beach

dblp:37/7946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
quality of life technology
0.112012
Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012
Design research and methods
user-centered design
0.112012
Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012
Design research and methods › design process
interdisciplinary design
0.012012
Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user-centered iterative design · 0.1needs assessment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach
abstract
Developing quality of life technologies (QoLT) poses unique challenges to engineers and computer scientists. This paper provides a roadmap for design, development, and evaluation. We begin with a definition of quality of life and identify key attributes of QoLT. This is followed by a discussion of methods for identifying target populations and needs. Next, we describe the process of user-centered iterative design and development and conclude with evaluation strategies to assess the impact of QoLT. A central theme of the paper is that successful technology development in this arena is highly dependent on collaborative interdisciplinary teams involving social scientists, clinicians, engineers, and computer scientists.
Richard Schulz, Scott R. Beach, Judith T. Matthews, Karen L. Courtney, Annette J. De Vito Dabbs
Proc. IEEE2