Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott R. Beach
dblp:37/7946
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Design research and methods · 56% Accessibility and assistive technology · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology
quality of life technology |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012 |
Design research and methods
user-centered design |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012 |
Design research and methods › design process
interdisciplinary design |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary Approach · Proc. IEEE 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user-centered iterative design · 0.1needs assessment · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Designing and Evaluating Quality of Life Technologies: An Interdisciplinary ApproachabstractDeveloping quality of life technologies (QoLT) poses unique challenges to engineers and computer scientists. This paper provides a roadmap for design, development, and evaluation. We begin with a definition of quality of life and identify key attributes of QoLT. This is followed by a discussion of methods for identifying target populations and needs. Next, we describe the process of user-centered iterative design and development and conclude with evaluation strategies to assess the impact of QoLT. A central theme of the paper is that successful technology development in this arena is highly dependent on collaborative interdisciplinary teams involving social scientists, clinicians, engineers, and computer scientists. Richard Schulz, Scott R. Beach, Judith T. Matthews, Karen L. Courtney, Annette J. De Vito Dabbs |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |