Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Howard J. Larsen
dblp:37/89
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 50% Compilers and program optimization · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 50% Digital forensics and information hiding · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
abstract data types |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Implementation of a Capability-Based Data Abstraction · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1978 |
Compilers and program optimization
compiler construction |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Implementation of a Capability-Based Data Abstraction · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1978 |
Authentication and access control
access control |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Implementation of a Capability-Based Data Abstraction · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1978 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
information hiding |
0.0 | 1 | 1978 | Implementation of a Capability-Based Data Abstraction · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1978 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compiler extension · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1978 | Implementation of a Capability-Based Data AbstractionabstractOne important feature in programming language design is an appropriate data definitional facility. Criteria now recognized as important are the concepts of information hiding and data abstraction. The problem, however, is to embed these ideas into languages. Although including these ideas has often led to the design of a new language, that is not always necessary. Such facilities may be added to languages like PL/1 or Pascal. This report discusses the inclusion of such facilities within one such PL/1 compiler. While the resulting system does not have the optimal set of protection features, it does have several advantages: the base language is known to a large class of programmers, there are many such compilers already written, and the system achieves almost as much protection as is needed. Marvin V. Zelkowitz, Howard J. Larsen |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |