Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lancelot F. James

dblp:37/9390 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 95% Graph learning · 5%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.522017
Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions · ICML 2017
Finite-Dimensional BFRY Priors and Variational Bayesian Inference for Power Law Models · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.312017
Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › relational model
random graph model
0.312017
Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic variational inference
0.312017
Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.212016
Finite-Dimensional BFRY Priors and Variational Bayesian Inference for Power Law Models · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Graph learning
stochastic block model
0.112017
Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions · ICML 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational bayesian inference · 0.3stochastic gradient ascent · 0.3gamma approximation · 0.3variational bayes · 0.2stable process · 0.2dirichlet process · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Bayesian model for sparse graphs with flexible degree distribution and overlapping community structure
abstract
We consider a non-projective class of inhomogeneous random graph models with interpretable parameters and a number of interesting asymptotic properties. Using the results of Bollobás et al. (2007), we show that i) the class of models is sparse and ii) depending on the choice of the parameters, the model is either scale-free, with power-law exponent greater than 2, or with an asymptotic degree distribution which is power-law with exponential cut-off. We propose an extension of the model that can accommodate an overlapping community structure. Scalable posterior inference can be performed due to the specific choice of the link probability. We present experiments on five different real world networks with up to 100,000 nodes and edges, showing that the model can provide a good fit to the degree distribution and recovers well the latent community structure.
Juho Lee 0001, Lancelot F. James, Seungjin Choi 0001, François Caron
AISTATS2
2017 Bayesian inference on random simple graphs with power law degree distributions
abstract
We present a model for random simple graphs with power law (i.e., heavy-tailed) degree distributions. To attain this behavior, the edge probabilities in the graph are constructed from Bertoin–Fujita–Roynette–Yor (BFRY) random variables, which have been recently utilized in Bayesian statistics for the construction of power law models in several applications. Our construction readily extends to capture the structure of latent factors, similarly to stochastic block-models, while maintaining its power law degree distribution. The BFRY random variables are well approximated by gamma random variables in a variational Bayesian inference routine, which we apply to several network datasets for which power law degree distributions are a natural assumption. By learning the parameters of the BFRY distribution via probabilistic inference, we are able to automatically select the appropriate power law behavior from the data. In order to further scale our inference procedure, we adopt stochastic gradient ascent routines where the gradients are computed on minibatches (i.e., subsets) of the edges in the graph.
Juho Lee 0001, Creighton Heaukulani, Zoubin Ghahramani, Lancelot F. James, Seungjin Choi 0001
ICML4
2016 Finite-Dimensional BFRY Priors and Variational Bayesian Inference for Power Law Models
abstract
Bayesian nonparametric methods based on the Dirichlet process (DP), gamma process and beta process, have proven effective in capturing aspects of various datasets arising in machine learning. However, it is now recognized that such processes have their limitations in terms of the ability to capture power law behavior. As such there is now considerable interest in models based on the Stable Processs (SP), Generalized Gamma process (GGP) and Stable-beta process (SBP). These models present new challenges in terms of practical statistical implementation. In analogy to tractable processes such as the finite-dimensional Dirichlet process, we describe a class of random processes, we call iid finite-dimensional BFRY processes, that enables one to begin to develop efficient posterior inference algorithms such as variational Bayes that readily scale to massive datasets. For illustrative purposes, we describe a simple variational Bayes algorithm for normalized SP mixture models, and demonstrate its usefulness with experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.
Juho Lee 0001, Lancelot F. James, Seungjin Choi 0001
NIPS2