Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sven Dähne
dblp:37/9736
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 80% Learning theory · 17% Representation and self-supervised learning · 2% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 75% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 25% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 50% Recommender systems · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | iNNvestigate Neural Networks! · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
layer-wise relevance propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | iNNvestigate Neural Networks! · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | iNNvestigate Neural Networks! · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
attribution methods |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
neural network interpretation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Learning From More Than One Data Source: Data Fusion Techniques for Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
multimodal neuroimaging fusion |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging Data · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging Data · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Data integration and cleaning
data fusion |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging Data · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
factor models |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging Data · Proc. IEEE 2015 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Integration of Multivariate Data Streams With Bandpower Signals · IEEE Trans. Multim. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
patternnet · 0.7patternattribution · 0.7machine learning · 0.4factor models · 0.4source power correlation analysis · 0.3signal separation · 0.3bandpower signal · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | iNNvestigate Neural Networks!abstractIn recent years, deep neural networks have revolutionized many application domains of machine learning and are key components of many critical decision or predictive processes. Therefore, it is crucial that domain specialists can understand and analyze actions and predictions, even of the most complex neural network architectures. Despite these arguments neural networks are often treated as black boxes. In the attempt to alleviate this shortcoming many analysis methods were proposed, yet the lack of reference implementations often makes a systematic comparison between the methods a major effort. The presented library innvestigate addresses this by providing a common interface and out-of-the-box implementation for many analysis methods, including the reference implementation for PatternNet and PatternAttribution as well as for LRP-methods. To demonstrate the versatility of innvestigate, we provide an analysis of image classifications for variety of state-of-the-art neural network architectures. Maximilian Alber, Sebastian Lapuschkin, Philipp Seegerer, Miriam Hägele, Kristof Schütt, Grégoire Montavon, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, Sven Dähne, Pieter-Jan Kindermans |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 9 |
| 2018 | Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttribution
Pieter-Jan Kindermans, Kristof Schütt, Maximilian Alber, Klaus-Robert Müller, Dumitru Erhan, Been Kim, Sven Dähne |
ICLR (Poster) | 7 |
| 2015 | Multivariate Machine Learning Methods for Fusing Multimodal Functional Neuroimaging DataabstractMultimodal data are ubiquitous in engineering, communications, robotics, computer vision, or more generally speaking in industry and the sciences. All disciplines have developed their respective sets of analytic tools to fuse the information that is available in all measured modalities. In this paper, we provide a review of classical as well as recent machine learning methods (specifically factor models) for fusing information from functional neuroimaging techniques such as: LFP, EEG, MEG, fNIRS, and fMRI. Early and late fusion scenarios are distinguished, and appropriate factor models for the respective scenarios are presented along with example applications from selected multimodal neuroimaging studies. Further emphasis is given to the interpretability of the resulting model parameters, in particular by highlighting how factor models relate to physical models needed for source localization. The methods we discuss allow for the extraction of information from neural data, which ultimately contributes to 1) better neuroscientific understanding; 2) enhance diagnostic performance; and 3) discover neural signals of interest that correlate maximally with a given cognitive paradigm. While we clearly study the multimodal functional neuroimaging challenge, the discussed machine learning techniques have a wide applicability, i.e., in general data fusion, and may thus be informative to the general interested reader. Sven Dähne, Felix Bießmann, Wojciech Samek, Stefan Haufe, Dominique Goltz, Christopher Gundlach, Arno Villringer, Siamac Fazli, Klaus-Robert Müller |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 2015 | Learning From More Than One Data Source: Data Fusion Techniques for Sensorimotor Rhythm-Based Brain-Computer InterfacesabstractBrain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are successfully used in scientific, therapeutic and other applications. Remaining challenges are among others a low signal-to-noise ratio of neural signals, lack of robustness for decoders in the presence of inter-trial and inter-subject variability, time constraints on the calibration phase and the use of BCIs outside a controlled lab environment. Recent advances in BCI research addressed these issues by novel combinations of complementary analysis as well as recording techniques, so called hybrid BCIs. In this paper, we review a number of data fusion techniques for BCI along with hybrid methods for BCI that have recently emerged. Our focus will be on sensorimotor rhythm-based BCIs. We will give an overview of the three main lines of research in this area, integration of complementary features of neural activation, integration of multiple previous sessions and of multiple subjects, and show how these techniques can be used to enhance modern BCI systems. Siamac Fazli, Sven Dähne, Wojciech Samek, Felix Bießmann, Klaus-Robert Müller |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |
| 2014 | Slow Feature Analysis on Retinal Waves Leads to V1 Complex CellsabstractThe developing visual system of many mammalian species is partially structured and organized even before the onset of vision. Spontaneous neural activity, which spreads in waves across the retina, has been suggested to play a major role in these prenatal structuring processes. Recently, it has been shown that when employing an efficient coding strategy, such as sparse coding, these retinal activity patterns lead to basis functions that resemble optimal stimuli of simple cells in primary visual cortex (V1). Here we present the results of applying a coding strategy that optimizes for temporal slowness, namely Slow Feature Analysis (SFA), to a biologically plausible model of retinal waves. Previously, SFA has been successfully applied to model parts of the visual system, most notably in reproducing a rich set of complex-cell features by training SFA with quasi-natural image sequences. In the present work, we obtain SFA units that share a number of properties with cortical complex-cells by training on simulated retinal waves. The emergence of two distinct properties of the SFA units (phase invariance and orientation tuning) is thoroughly investigated via control experiments and mathematical analysis of the input-output functions found by SFA. The results support the idea that retinal waves share relevant temporal and spatial properties with natural visual input. Hence, retinal waves seem suitable training stimuli to learn invariances and thereby shape the developing early visual system such that it is best prepared for coding input from the natural world. Sven Dähne, Niko Wilbert, Laurenz Wiskott |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2013 | User-centered design in brain-computer interfaces - A case studyabstractOBJECTIVE: The array of available brain-computer interface (BCI) paradigms has continued to grow, and so has the corresponding set of machine learning methods which are at the core of BCI systems. The latter have evolved to provide more robust data analysis solutions, and as a consequence the proportion of healthy BCI users who can use a BCI successfully is growing. With this development the chances have increased that the needs and abilities of specific patients, the end-users, can be covered by an existing BCI approach. However, most end-users who have experienced the use of a BCI system at all have encountered a single paradigm only. This paradigm is typically the one that is being tested in the study that the end-user happens to be enrolled in, along with other end-users. Though this corresponds to the preferred study arrangement for basic research, it does not ensure that the end-user experiences a working BCI. In this study, a different approach was taken; that of a user-centered design. It is the prevailing process in traditional assistive technology. Given an individual user with a particular clinical profile, several available BCI approaches are tested and - if necessary - adapted to him/her until a suitable BCI system is found. METHODS: Described is the case of a 48-year-old woman who suffered from an ischemic brain stem stroke, leading to a severe motor- and communication deficit. She was enrolled in studies with two different BCI systems before a suitable system was found. The first was an auditory event-related potential (ERP) paradigm and the second a visual ERP paradigm, both of which are established in literature. RESULTS: The auditory paradigm did not work successfully, despite favorable preconditions. The visual paradigm worked flawlessly, as found over several sessions. This discrepancy in performance can possibly be explained by the user's clinical deficit in several key neuropsychological indicators, such as attention and working memory. While the auditory paradigm relies on both categories, the visual paradigm could be used with lower cognitive workload. Besides attention and working memory, several other neurophysiological and -psychological indicators - and the role they play in the BCIs at hand - are discussed. CONCLUSION: The user's performance on the first BCI paradigm would typically have excluded her from further ERP-based BCI studies. However, this study clearly shows that, with the numerous paradigms now at our disposal, the pursuit for a functioning BCI system should not be stopped after an initial failed attempt. Martijn Schreuder, Angela Riccio, Monica Risetti, Sven Dähne, Andrew Ramsay, John Williamson 0001, Donatella Mattia, Michael Tangermann |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 4 |
| 2013 | Integration of Multivariate Data Streams With Bandpower SignalsabstractThe urge to further our understanding of multimodal neural data has recently become an important topic due to the ever increasing availability of simultaneously recorded data from different neural imaging modalities. In case where EEG is one of the modalities, it is of interest to relate a nonlinear function of the raw EEG time-domain signal, say, EEG band power, to another modality such as the hemodynamic response, as measured with NIRS or fMRI. In this work we tackle exactly this problem defining a novel algorithm that we denote multimodal source power correlation analysis (mSPoC). The validity and high performance of the mSPoC framework is demonstrated for simulated and real-world multimodal data. Sven Dähne, Felix Bießmann, Frank C. Meinecke, Jan Mehnert, Siamac Fazli, Klaus-Robert Müller |
IEEE Trans. Multim. | 1 |
| 2011 | Slow Feature Analysis - A Tool for Extraction of Discriminating Event-Related Potentials in Brain-Computer Interfaces
Sven Dähne, Johannes Höhne, Martijn Schreuder, Michael Tangermann |
ICANN (1) | 1 |