EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuaida He
dblp:370/0579
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 75% Learning theory · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization Analysis of Stochastic Weight Averaging with General Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › mini-batch sampling
sampling without replacement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization Analysis of Stochastic Weight Averaging with General Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization Analysis of Stochastic Weight Averaging with General Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › iterate averaging
stochastic weight averaging |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalization Analysis of Stochastic Weight Averaging with General Sampling · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform stability · 0.8mathematical induction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Generalization Analysis of Stochastic Weight Averaging with General SamplingabstractStochastic weight averaging (SWA) method has empirically proven its advantages compared to stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Despite it is widespread used, theoretical investigations have been limited, particularly in scenarios beyond the ideal setting of convex and sampling with replacement. However, non-convex cases and sampling without replacement are very practical in real-world applications. The main challenges under the above settings are two-folds: (i) All the historical gradient information introduced by SWA is considered, while the analysis of SGD using the tool of uniform stability requires only to bound the current gradient. (ii) The $(1+\alpha\beta)$-expansion property causes the boundary of each gradient step dependent on the previous step, making the boundary of each historical gradient in SWA nested and the theoretical analysis even harder. To address the theoretical challenges, we adopt mathematical induction to find a recursive representation that bounds the gradient at each step. Based on this, we establish stability bounds supporting sampling with and without replacement in the non-convex setting. Furthermore, the derived generalization bounds of SWA are sharper than SGD. At last, experimental results on several benchmarks verify our theoretical results. Li Shen 0008, Zerui Tao, Shuaida He, Dacheng Tao |
ICML | 4 |