Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seonhwa Kim
dblp:370/4621
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Identity-preserving Distillation Sampling by Fixed-Point Iterator · CVPR 2025 Self-rectifying Diffusion Sampling with Perturbed-Attention Guidance · ECCV (73) 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score distillation sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identity-preserving Distillation Sampling by Fixed-Point Iterator · CVPR 2025 |
Visual content generation and editing
image editing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identity-preserving Distillation Sampling by Fixed-Point Iterator · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Self-rectifying Diffusion Sampling with Perturbed-Attention Guidance · ECCV (73) 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein structure refinement |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
side-chain prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy function · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural radiance field · 1.7fixed-point iterative regularization · 1.7perturbed-attention guidance · 0.8molecular mechanics energy function · 0.7deep neural network · 0.7conformational space annealing · 0.7conditional random field · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Identity-preserving Distillation Sampling by Fixed-Point IteratorabstractScore distillation sampling (SDS) demonstrates a powerful capability for text-conditioned 2D image and 3D object generation by distilling the knowledge from learned score functions. However, SDS often suffers from blurriness caused by noisy gradients. When SDS meets the image editing, such degradations can be reduced by adjusting bias shifts using reference pairs, but the de-biasing techniques are still corrupted by erroneous gradients. To this end, we introduce Identity-preserving Distillation Sampling (IDS), which compensates for the gradient leading to undesired changes in the results. Based on the analysis that these errors come from the text-conditioned scores, a new regularization technique, called fixed-point iterative regularization (FPR), is proposed to modify the score itself, driving the preservation of the identity even including poses and structures. Thanks to a self-correction by FPR, the proposed method provides clear and unambiguous representations corresponding to the given prompts in image-to-image editing and editable neural radiance field (NeRF). The structural consistency between the source and the edited data is obviously maintained compared to other state-of-the-art methods. Our code is https://github.com/shhh0620/IDS Seonhwa Kim, Soobin Park, Donghoon Ahn, Seungryong Kim, Kyong Hwan Jin, Eun Ju Cha |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2025 | Rigidity of Nonconvex Polyhedra with Respect to Edge Lengths and Dihedral Angles
Yunhi Cho, Seonhwa Kim |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 2 |
| 2024 | Self-rectifying Diffusion Sampling with Perturbed-Attention Guidance
Donghoon Ahn, Hyoungwon Cho, Jaewon Min, Woo-seok Jang, Seonhwa Kim, Hyun Hee Park, Kyong Hwan Jin, Seungryong Kim |
ECCV (73) | 6 |
| 2023 | DeepFold: enhancing protein structure prediction through optimized loss functions, improved template features, and re-optimized energy functionabstractMOTIVATION: Predicting protein structures with high accuracy is a critical challenge for the broad community of life sciences and industry. Despite progress made by deep neural networks like AlphaFold2, there is a need for further improvements in the quality of detailed structures, such as side-chains, along with protein backbone structures. RESULTS: Building upon the successes of AlphaFold2, the modifications we made include changing the losses of side-chain torsion angles and frame aligned point error, adding loss functions for side chain confidence and secondary structure prediction, and replacing template feature generation with a new alignment method based on conditional random fields. We also performed re-optimization by conformational space annealing using a molecular mechanics energy function which integrates the potential energies obtained from distogram and side-chain prediction. In the CASP15 blind test for single protein and domain modeling (109 domains), DeepFold ranked fourth among 132 groups with improvements in the details of the structure in terms of backbone, side-chain, and Molprobity. In terms of protein backbone accuracy, DeepFold achieved a median GDT-TS score of 88.64 compared with 85.88 of AlphaFold2. For TBM-easy/hard targets, DeepFold ranked at the top based on Z-scores for GDT-TS. This shows its practical value to the structural biology community, which demands highly accurate structures. In addition, a thorough analysis of 55 domains from 39 targets with publicly available structures indicates that DeepFold shows superior side-chain accuracy and Molprobity scores among the top-performing groups. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepFold tools are open-source software available at https://github.com/newtonjoo/deepfold. Jae-Won Lee, Jong-Hyun Won, Seonggwang Jeon, Yujin Choo, Yubin Yeon, Jin-Seon Oh, Seonhwa Kim, InSuk Joung, Cheongjae Jang, Sung Jong Lee, Kyong Hwan Jin, Giltae Song, Eun-Sol Kim, Jejoong Yoo, Eunok Paek, Yung-Kyun Noh, Keehyoung Joo |
Bioinform. | 8 |