Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yubo Shuai
dblp:370/5096
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › tumor evolution
clonal evolution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | cloneRate: fast estimation of single-cell clonal dynamics using coalescent theory · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | cloneRate: fast estimation of single-cell clonal dynamics using coalescent theory · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | cloneRate: fast estimation of single-cell clonal dynamics using coalescent theory · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
phylogenetic reconstruction · 0.7coalescent theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | cloneRate: fast estimation of single-cell clonal dynamics using coalescent theoryabstractMOTIVATION: While evolutionary approaches to medicine show promise, measuring evolution itself is difficult due to experimental constraints and the dynamic nature of body systems. In cancer evolution, continuous observation of clonal architecture is impossible, and longitudinal samples from multiple timepoints are rare. Increasingly available DNA sequencing datasets at single-cell resolution enable the reconstruction of past evolution using mutational history, allowing for a better understanding of dynamics prior to detectable disease. There is an unmet need for an accurate, fast, and easy-to-use method to quantify clone growth dynamics from these datasets. RESULTS: We derived methods based on coalescent theory for estimating the net growth rate of clones using either reconstructed phylogenies or the number of shared mutations. We applied and validated our analytical methods for estimating the net growth rate of clones, eliminating the need for complex simulations used in previous methods. When applied to hematopoietic data, we show that our estimates may have broad applications to improve mechanistic understanding and prognostic ability. Compared to clones with a single or unknown driver mutation, clones with multiple drivers have significantly increased growth rates (median 0.94 versus 0.25 per year; P = 1.6×10-6). Further, stratifying patients with a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) by the growth rate of their fittest clone shows that higher growth rates are associated with shorter time to MPN diagnosis (median 13.9 versus 26.4 months; P = 0.0026). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We developed a publicly available R package, cloneRate, to implement our methods (Package website: https://bdj34.github.io/cloneRate/). Source code: https://github.com/bdj34/cloneRate/. Yubo Shuai, Jason Schweinsberg, Kit Curtius |
Bioinform. | 2 |