Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Chuck Harrell

dblp:370/5125 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data processing
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.712023
excluderanges: exclusion sets for T2T-CHM13, GRCm39, and other genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.712023
excluderanges: exclusion sets for T2T-CHM13, GRCm39, and other genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sponge sequences · 1.0read alignment · 1.0blacklist exclusion sets · 1.0r/bioconductor package · 0.7data integration · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches
abstract
MOTIVATION: Short-read sequencing data can be affected by alignment artifacts in certain genomic regions. Removing reads overlapping these exclusion regions, previously known as Blacklists, help to potentially improve biological signal. Alternatively, "sponge" or decoy sequences have been proposed to reduce alignment artifacts. RESULTS: We examined the widely used Blacklist software and found that pre-generated exclusion sets were difficult to reproduce due to sensitivity to input data, aligner choice, and read length. We further explored the use of "sponge" sequences-unassembled genomic regions such as satellite DNA, ribosomal DNA, and mitochondrial DNA-as an alternative approach. We additionally investigated the effect of the T2T-CHM13 genome assembly on improving biological signals. Aligning reads to a genome that includes sponge sequences reduced signal correlation in ChIP-seq data comparably to Blacklist-derived exclusion sets while preserving biological signal. Sponge-based alignment also had minimal impact on RNA-seq gene counts, suggesting broader applicability beyond chromatin profiling. These results highlight the limitations of fixed exclusion sets, and recommend the use of the T2T-CHM13 assembly or, for the hg38 genome assembly, "sponge" sequences as an alignment-guided strategy for reducing artifacts and improving functional genomics analyses.
Brydon P. G. Wall, Jonathan D. Ogata, My Nguyen, Amy L. Olex, Konstantinos V. Floros, Anthony C. Faber, Joseph L. McClay, J. Chuck Harrell, Mikhail G. Dozmorov
Bioinform.8
2023 excluderanges: exclusion sets for T2T-CHM13, GRCm39, and other genome assemblies
abstract
SUMMARY: Exclusion regions are sections of reference genomes with abnormal pileups of short sequencing reads. Removing reads overlapping them improves biological signal, and these benefits are most pronounced in differential analysis settings. Several labs created exclusion region sets, available primarily through ENCODE and Github. However, the variety of exclusion sets creates uncertainty which sets to use. Furthermore, gap regions (e.g. centromeres, telomeres, short arms) create additional considerations in generating exclusion sets. We generated exclusion sets for the latest human T2T-CHM13 and mouse GRCm39 genomes and systematically assembled and annotated these and other sets in the excluderanges R/Bioconductor data package, also accessible via the BEDbase.org API. The package provides unified access to 82 GenomicRanges objects covering six organisms, multiple genome assemblies, and types of exclusion regions. For human hg38 genome assembly, we recommend hg38.Kundaje.GRCh38_unified_blacklist as the most well-curated and annotated, and sets generated by the Blacklist tool for other organisms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bioconductor.org/packages/excluderanges/. Package website: https://dozmorovlab.github.io/excluderanges/.
Jonathan D. Ogata, Wancen Mu, Eric S. Davis, Bingjie Xue, J. Chuck Harrell, Nathan C. Sheffield, Douglas H. Phanstiel, Michael I. Love, Mikhail G. Dozmorov
Bioinform.5