Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Herve Emissah
dblp:370/5528
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-6189-8215ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 77% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › scientometrics
bibliometric analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
citation tracking · 0.7bibliometric analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharingabstractSUMMARY: Neural morphology, the branching geometry of brain cells, is an essential cellular substrate of nervous system function and pathology. Despite the accelerating production of digital reconstructions of neural morphology, the public accessibility of data remains a core issue in neuroscience. Deficiencies in the availability of existing data create redundancy of research efforts and limit synergy. We carried out a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of neural morphology publications to quantify the impact of data sharing in the neuroscience community. Our findings demonstrate that sharing digital reconstructions of neural morphology via NeuroMorpho.Org leads to a significant increase of citations to the original article, thus directly benefiting authors. The rate of data reusage remains constant for at least 16 years after sharing (the whole period analyzed), altogether nearly doubling the peer-reviewed discoveries in the field. Furthermore, the recent availability of larger and more numerous datasets fostered integrative applications, which accrue on average twice the citations of re-analyses of individual datasets. We also released an open-source citation tracking web-service allowing researchers to monitor reusage of their datasets in independent peer-reviewed reports. These results and tools can facilitate the recognition of shared data reuse for merit evaluations and funding decisions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The application is available at: http://cng-nmo-dev3.orc.gmu.edu:8181/. The source code at https://github.com/HerveEmissah/nmo-authors-app and https://github.com/HerveEmissah/nmo-bibliometric-analysis. Herve Emissah, Bengt Ljungquist, Giorgio A. Ascoli |
Bioinform. | 1 |