Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mia Shu
dblp:370/5530
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
interpretable machine learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multi-omics data integration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
pathway enrichment analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
meta-learning · 0.7cox hazard loss · 0.7DeepLIFT · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichmentabstractMOTIVATION: Despite the success of recent machine learning algorithms' applications to survival analysis, their black-box nature hinders interpretability, which is arguably the most important aspect. Similarly, multi-omics data integration for survival analysis is often constrained by the underlying relationships and correlations that are rarely well understood. The goal of this work is to alleviate the interpretability problem in machine learning approaches for survival analysis and also demonstrate how multi-omics data integration improves survival analysis and pathway enrichment. We use meta-learning, a machine-learning algorithm that is trained on a variety of related datasets and allows quick adaptations to new tasks, to perform survival analysis and pathway enrichment on pan-cancer datasets. In recent machine learning research, meta-learning has been effectively used for knowledge transfer among multiple related datasets. RESULTS: We use meta-learning with Cox hazard loss to show that the integration of TCGA pan-cancer data increases the performance of survival analysis. We also apply advanced model interpretability method called DeepLIFT (Deep Learning Important FeaTures) to show different sets of enriched pathways for multi-omics and transcriptomics data. Our results show that multi-omics cancer survival analysis enhances performance compared with using transcriptomics or clinical data alone. Additionally, we show a correlation between variable importance assignment from DeepLIFT and gene coenrichment, suggesting that genes with higher and similar contribution scores are more likely to be enriched together in the same enrichment sets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/berkuva/TCGA-omics-integration. Hyun Jae Cho, Mia Shu, Stefan Bekiranov, Chongzhi Zang, Aidong Zhang 0001 |
Bioinform. | 2 |