Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mia Shu

dblp:370/5530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
interpretable machine learning
0.712023
Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multi-omics data integration
0.712023
Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
pathway enrichment analysis
0.712023
Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis
0.712023
Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meta-learning · 0.7cox hazard loss · 0.7DeepLIFT · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Despite the success of recent machine learning algorithms' applications to survival analysis, their black-box nature hinders interpretability, which is arguably the most important aspect. Similarly, multi-omics data integration for survival analysis is often constrained by the underlying relationships and correlations that are rarely well understood. The goal of this work is to alleviate the interpretability problem in machine learning approaches for survival analysis and also demonstrate how multi-omics data integration improves survival analysis and pathway enrichment. We use meta-learning, a machine-learning algorithm that is trained on a variety of related datasets and allows quick adaptations to new tasks, to perform survival analysis and pathway enrichment on pan-cancer datasets. In recent machine learning research, meta-learning has been effectively used for knowledge transfer among multiple related datasets. RESULTS: We use meta-learning with Cox hazard loss to show that the integration of TCGA pan-cancer data increases the performance of survival analysis. We also apply advanced model interpretability method called DeepLIFT (Deep Learning Important FeaTures) to show different sets of enriched pathways for multi-omics and transcriptomics data. Our results show that multi-omics cancer survival analysis enhances performance compared with using transcriptomics or clinical data alone. Additionally, we show a correlation between variable importance assignment from DeepLIFT and gene coenrichment, suggesting that genes with higher and similar contribution scores are more likely to be enriched together in the same enrichment sets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/berkuva/TCGA-omics-integration.
Hyun Jae Cho, Mia Shu, Stefan Bekiranov, Chongzhi Zang, Aidong Zhang 0001
Bioinform.2