Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tilman Schäfers
dblp:370/5785
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 63% Medical and health informatics · 37% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | genomepy: genes and genomes at your fingertips · Bioinform. 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › drug development › clinical trial › clinical trial informatics
clinical trial analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | RAINFOREST: a random forest approach to predict treatment benefit in data from (failed) clinical drug trials · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
computational drug discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | RAINFOREST: a random forest approach to predict treatment benefit in data from (failed) clinical drug trials · Bioinform. 2020 |
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient subgroup identification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | RAINFOREST: a random forest approach to predict treatment benefit in data from (failed) clinical drug trials · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | genomepy: genes and genomes at your fingertips · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | genomepy: genes and genomes at your fingertips · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.4machine learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | genomepy: genes and genomes at your fingertipsabstractMOTIVATION: Analyzing a functional genomics experiment, such as ATAC-, ChIP-, or RNA-sequencing, requires genomic resources such as a reference genome assembly and gene annotation. These data can generally be retrieved from different organizations and in different versions. Most bioinformatic workflows require the user to supply this genomic data manually, which can be a tedious and error-prone process. RESULTS: Here, we present genomepy, which can search, download, and preprocess the right genomic data for your analysis. Genomepy can search genomic data on NCBI, Ensembl, UCSC, and GENCODE, and inspect available gene annotations to enable an informed decision. The selected genome and gene annotation can be downloaded and preprocessed with sensible, yet controllable, defaults. Additional supporting data can be automatically generated or downloaded, such as aligner indexes, genome metadata, and blacklists. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Genomepy is freely available at https://github.com/vanheeringen-lab/genomepy under the MIT license and can be installed through pip or Bioconda. Siebren Frölich, Maarten van der Sande, Tilman Schäfers, Simon J. van Heeringen |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2020 | RAINFOREST: a random forest approach to predict treatment benefit in data from (failed) clinical drug trialsabstractMOTIVATION: When phase III clinical drug trials fail their endpoint, enormous resources are wasted. Moreover, even if a clinical trial demonstrates a significant benefit, the observed effects are often small and may not outweigh the side effects of the drug. Therefore, there is a great clinical need for methods to identify genetic markers that can identify subgroups of patients which are likely to benefit from treatment as this may (i) rescue failed clinical trials and/or (ii) identify subgroups of patients which benefit more than the population as a whole. When single genetic biomarkers cannot be found, machine learning approaches that find multivariate signatures are required. For single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles, this is extremely challenging owing to the high dimensionality of the data. Here, we introduce RAINFOREST (tReAtment benefIt prediction using raNdom FOREST), which can predict treatment benefit from patient SNP profiles obtained in a clinical trial setting. RESULTS: We demonstrate the performance of RAINFOREST on the CAIRO2 dataset, a phase III clinical trial which tested the addition of cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer and concluded there was no benefit. However, we find that RAINFOREST is able to identify a subgroup comprising 27.7% of the patients that do benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.69 (P = 0.04) in favor of cetuximab. The method is not specific to colorectal cancer and could aid in reanalysis of clinical trial data and provide a more personalized approach to cancer treatment, also when there is no clear link between a single variant and treatment benefit. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R code used to produce the results in this paper can be found at github.com/jubels/RAINFOREST. A more configurable, user-friendly Python implementation of RAINFOREST is also provided. Due to restrictions based on privacy regulations and informed consent of participants, phenotype and genotype data of the CAIRO2 trial cannot be made freely available in a public repository. Data from this study can be obtained upon request. Requests should be directed toward Prof. Dr. H.J. Guchelaar ([email protected]). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Joske Ubels, Tilman Schäfers, Cornelis Punt, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Jeroen de Ridder |
Bioinform. | 2 |