EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kevin N. Lin
dblp:370/5872
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 50% Performance modeling and evaluation · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › storage devices › molecular data storage
DNA storage |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | FrameD: framework for DNA-based data storage design, verification, and validation · Bioinform. 2023 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › computer system simulation
storage system simulation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | FrameD: framework for DNA-based data storage design, verification, and validation · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel simulation · 0.7multiple sequence alignment · 0.7fault injection · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | FrameD: framework for DNA-based data storage design, verification, and validationabstractMOTIVATION: DNA-based data storage is a quickly growing field that hopes to harness the massive theoretical information density of DNA molecules to produce a competitive next-generation storage medium suitable for archival data. In recent years, many DNA-based storage system designs have been proposed. Given that no common infrastructure exists for simulating these storage systems, comparing many different designs along with many different error models is increasingly difficult. To address this challenge, we introduce FrameD, a simulation infrastructure for DNA storage systems that leverages the underlying modularity of DNA storage system designs to provide a framework to express different designs while being able to reuse common components. RESULTS: We demonstrate the utility of FrameD and the need for a common simulation platform using a case study. Our case study compares designs that utilize strand copies differently, some that align strand copies using multiple sequence alignment algorithms and others that do not. We found that the choice to include multiple sequence alignment in the pipeline is dependent on the error rate and the type of errors being injected and is not always beneficial. In addition to supporting a wide range of designs, FrameD provides the user with transparent parallelism to deal with a large number of reads from sequencing and the need for many fault injection iterations. We believe that FrameD fills a void in the tools publicly available to the DNA storage community by providing a modular and extensible framework with support for massive parallelism. As a result, it will help accelerate the design process of future DNA-based storage systems. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code for FrameD along with the data generated during the demonstration of FrameD is available in a public Github repository at https://github.com/dna-storage/framed, (https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7757762). Kevin Volkel, Kevin N. Lin, Paul W. Hook, Winston Timp, Albert J. Keung, James Tuck 0001 |
Bioinform. | 2 |