Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Schmid

dblp:371/0968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › out-of-distribution detection
outlier exposure
0.812024
Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.812024
Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.812024
Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
neural operator
0.812024
Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2024
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning
0.812024
Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

latent space dynamics · 1.5inverse encoding and decoding · 1.5outlier exposure · 0.8hopfield energy · 0.8boosting · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Universal Physics Transformers: A Framework For Efficiently Scaling Neural Operators
abstract
Neural operators, serving as physics surrogate models, have recently gained increased interest. With ever increasing problem complexity, the natural question arises: what is an efficient way to scale neural operators to larger and more complex simulations - most importantly by taking into account different types of simulation datasets. This is of special interest since, akin to their numerical counterparts, different techniques are used across applications, even if the underlying dynamics of the systems are similar. Whereas the flexibility of transformers has enabled unified architectures across domains, neural operators mostly follow a problem specific design, where GNNs are commonly used for Lagrangian simulations and grid-based models predominate Eulerian simulations. We introduce Universal Physics Transformers (UPTs), an efficient and unified learning paradigm for a wide range of spatio-temporal problems. UPTs operate without grid- or particle-based latent structures, enabling flexibility and scalability across meshes and particles. UPTs efficiently propagate dynamics in the latent space, emphasized by inverse encoding and decoding techniques. Finally, UPTs allow for queries of the latent space representation at any point in space-time. We demonstrate diverse applicability and efficacy of UPTs in mesh-based fluid simulations, and steady-state Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes simulations, and Lagrangian-based dynamics.
Benedikt Alkin, Andreas Fürst, Simon Schmid, Lukas Gruber, Markus Holzleitner, Johannes Brandstetter
NeurIPS3
2024 Energy-based Hopfield Boosting for Out-of-Distribution Detection
abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is critical when deploying machine learning models in the real world. Outlier exposure methods, which incorporate auxiliary outlier data in the training process, can drastically improve OOD detection performance compared to approaches without advanced training strategies. We introduce Hopfield Boosting, a boosting approach, which leverages modern Hopfield energy to sharpen the decision boundary between the in-distribution and OOD data. Hopfield Boosting encourages the model to focus on hard-to-distinguish auxiliary outlier examples that lie close to the decision boundary between in-distribution and auxiliary outlier data. Our method achieves a new state-of-the-art in OOD detection with outlier exposure, improving the FPR95 from 2.28 to 0.92 on CIFAR-10, from 11.76 to 7.94 on CIFAR-100, and from 50.74 to 36.60 on ImageNet-1K.
Claus Hofmann, Simon Schmid, Bernhard Lehner, Daniel Klotz, Sepp Hochreiter
NeurIPS2