EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Egle Maria Orlando
dblp:371/3239
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-5849-6830ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 88% Wearable and physiological sensing · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
collaborative robot |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Who is Supporting Whom? Balanced and Unbalanced Support Perceptions Shaping Acceptance of Collaborative Robots · HRI 2025 |
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding workers' psychological states and physiological responses during human-robot collaboration · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025 |
Human-robot interaction › long-term interaction
human-robot relationship |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Who is Supporting Whom? Balanced and Unbalanced Support Perceptions Shaping Acceptance of Collaborative Robots · HRI 2025 |
Wearable and physiological sensing
physiological responses |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Understanding workers' psychological states and physiological responses during human-robot collaboration · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
questionnaire · 0.9observational study · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Who is Supporting Whom? Balanced and Unbalanced Support Perceptions Shaping Acceptance of Collaborative RobotsabstractHumans and industrial collaborative robots (cobots) form intricate relationships as they both possess agency, share spaces, and must coordinate effectively to work together. In initial interactions, much like human-team dynamics, the perceived contribution of each agent plays a crucial role in shaping the collaborative experience and the acceptance of cobots. Beyond unilateral support perceptions from or to the cobot—termed as Received Support (RS) and Given Support (GS)—Mutual Support (MS) embodies a balanced, reciprocal dynamic where humans view their contribution as equal to that of the cobot. Drawing from social knowledge in human teams and aligning with recent interpretations of human-robot interactions, we propose that perceiving MS can foster fluent, trusting, and harmonious collaboration, ultimately increasing cobot acceptance in work routines. In this observational study, 56 novices collaborated with the industrial cobot UR10e to assess support dynamics. We explored how perceptions of balanced (MS) or unbalanced support (RS and GS) impact task performance (i.e., task time), Cognitive Factors (COG-F), User Experience (UX-F), and Human-Robot Relationship Factors (HRR-F), ultimately influencing cobot acceptance. We also examined the influence of initial attitudes toward robots. The findings suggest that fostering perceptions of MS, rather than focusing solely on functionality or work relief (RS), can lead to smoother integration and greater acceptance of cobots, especially among novices, regardless of their initial attitudes toward robots. Federica Nenna, Egle Maria Orlando, Davide Zanardi, Giulia Buodo, Luciano Gamberini |
HRI | 2 |
| 2025 | Understanding workers' psychological states and physiological responses during human-robot collaboration
Egle Maria Orlando, Federica Nenna, Davide Zanardi, Giulia Buodo, Michele Mingardi, Michela Sarlo, Luciano Gamberini |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 1 |