Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammed Aldeen

dblp:371/4077 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7603-0765ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
3 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
mobile app privacy
0.912025
No Way to Sign Out? Unpacking Non-Compliance with Google Play's App Account Deletion Requirements · USENIX Security Symposium 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy notice
0.912025
SKILLPoV: Towards Accessible and Effective Privacy Notice for Amazon Alexa Skills · NDSS 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy in ubiquitous computing
voice assistant privacy
0.912025
SKILLPoV: Towards Accessible and Effective Privacy Notice for Amazon Alexa Skills · NDSS 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance
GDPR compliance
0.812024
Understanding GDPR Non-Compliance in Privacy Policies of Alexa Skills in European Marketplaces · WWW 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy policy analysis
0.812024
Understanding GDPR Non-Compliance in Privacy Policies of Alexa Skills in European Marketplaces · WWW 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy-enhancing technologies
data deletion
0.312025
No Way to Sign Out? Unpacking Non-Compliance with Google Play's App Account Deletion Requirements · USENIX Security Symposium 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement study · 1.5measurement study · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SKILLPoV: Towards Accessible and Effective Privacy Notice for Amazon Alexa Skills
Song Liao, Mohammed Aldeen, Luyi Xing, Danfeng Yao, Long Cheng 0005
NDSS3
2025 No Way to Sign Out? Unpacking Non-Compliance with Google Play's App Account Deletion Requirements
Song Liao, Mohammed Aldeen, Salish Kumar, Long Cheng 0005
USENIX Security Symposium4
2024 An Initial Exploration of Employing Large Multimodal Models in Defending Against Autonomous Vehicles Attacks
abstract
As the advent of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology revolutionizes transportation, it simultaneously introduces new vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks, posing significant challenges to vehicle safety and security. The complexity of these systems, coupled with their increasing reliance on advanced computer vision and machine learning algorithms, makes them susceptible to sophisticated AV attacks. This paper explores the potential of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in identifying Natural Denoising Diffusion (NDD) attacks on traffic signs. Our comparative analysis show the superior performance of LMMs in detecting NDD samples with an average accuracy of 82.52% across the selected models compared to 37.75% for state-of-the-art deep learning models. We further discuss the integration of LMMs within the resource-constrained computational environments to mimic typical autonomous vehicles and assess their practicality through latency benchmarks. Results show substantial superiority of GPT models in achieving lower latency, down to 4.5 seconds per image for both computation time and network latency (RTT), suggesting a viable path towards real-world deployability. Lastly, we extend our analysis to LMMs’ applicability against a wider spectrum of AV attacks, particularly focusing on the Automated Lane Centering systems, emphasizing the potential of LMMs to enhance vehicular cybersecurity.
Mohammed Aldeen, Pedram MohajerAnsari, Mashrur Chowdhury, Long Cheng 0005, Mert D. Pesé
IV1
2024 Understanding GDPR Non-Compliance in Privacy Policies of Alexa Skills in European Marketplaces
abstract
Amazon Alexa is one of the largest Voice Personal Assistant (VPA) platforms and it allows third-party developers to publish their voice apps, named skills, to the Alexa skill store. To satisfy the needs of European users, Amazon Alexa has established multiple skill marketplaces in Europe and allows developers to publish skills in their native languages. Skills in European marketplaces are required to comply with GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), which imposes strict obligations on data collection and processing. Skills that involve data collection should provide a privacy policy to disclose the data practice to users and meet GDPR requirements.
Song Liao, Mohammed Aldeen, Long Cheng 0005, Xiapu Luo, Haipeng Cai, Hongxin Hu
WWW2
2023 ChatGPT vs. Human Annotators: A Comprehensive Analysis of ChatGPT for Text Annotation
abstract
In recent years, the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) has witnessed a groundbreaking transformation with the emergence of large language models (LLMs). ChatGPT stands out as an example among these LLM models captivating considerable public interest due to its impressive language generation capabilities. Researchers have been exploring the potential of using ChatGPT for data annotation tasks, aiming to discover more timesaving and cost-effective approaches. In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation of ChatGPT's data annotation capabilities across ten diverse datasets covering various subject areas and varied number of classes. To ensure the quality of our evaluation, we leveraged datasets that were previously annotated by human experts, providing a reliable benchmark for comparison. Through rigorous experimentation, we assessed the impact of different prompt strategies and model configurations on the annotation performance. Our findings emphasize the capability of ChatGPT in handling most data annotation tasks achieving average accuracy of 78.2% across various tasks. The banking queries dataset stands out with an impressive 95.9% accuracy, while emotions classification presents challenges, yielding an accuracy of 57.5%. Our evaluation also highlights the impact of prompt strategies on annotation performance and reveals significant performance differences between GPT models, with “gpt-4” achieving higher accuracy 79.2% on average compared to “gpt-3.5” of 74.6%. Our research provides valuable insights into the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT in automating data annotation tasks.
Mohammed Aldeen, Joshua Luo, Ashley Lian, Venus Zheng, Allen Hong, Preethika Yetukuri, Long Cheng 0005
ICMLA1