Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mehrzad Mohammadi
dblp:371/4236
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal benchmark
visual reasoning benchmark |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 2.0large language model · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in RoboticsabstractRecent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced visual reasoning, a key capability for embodied AI agents like robots. However, existing visual reasoning benchmarks often suffer from several limitations: they lack a clear definition of reasoning complexity, offer have no control to generate questions over varying difficulty and task customization, and fail to provide structured, step-by-step reasoning annotations (workflows). To bridge these gaps, we formalize reasoning complexity, introduce an adaptive query engine that generates customizable questions of varying complexity with detailed intermediate annotations, and extend the JRDB dataset with human-object interaction and geometric relationship annotations to create JRDB-Reasoning, a benchmark tailored for visual reasoning in human-crowded environments. Our engine and benchmark enable fine-grained evaluation of visual reasoning frameworks and dynamic assessment of visual-language models across reasoning levels. Simindokht Jahangard, Mehrzad Mohammadi, Zhixi Cai, Seyed Hamid Rezatofighi |
AAAI | 2 |