Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mehrzad Mohammadi

dblp:371/4236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
1.012026
JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal benchmark
visual reasoning benchmark
1.012026
JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 2.0large language model · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics
abstract
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced visual reasoning, a key capability for embodied AI agents like robots. However, existing visual reasoning benchmarks often suffer from several limitations: they lack a clear definition of reasoning complexity, offer have no control to generate questions over varying difficulty and task customization, and fail to provide structured, step-by-step reasoning annotations (workflows). To bridge these gaps, we formalize reasoning complexity, introduce an adaptive query engine that generates customizable questions of varying complexity with detailed intermediate annotations, and extend the JRDB dataset with human-object interaction and geometric relationship annotations to create JRDB-Reasoning, a benchmark tailored for visual reasoning in human-crowded environments. Our engine and benchmark enable fine-grained evaluation of visual reasoning frameworks and dynamic assessment of visual-language models across reasoning levels.
Simindokht Jahangard, Mehrzad Mohammadi, Zhixi Cai, Seyed Hamid Rezatofighi
AAAI2