Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Livnat Jerby
dblp:371/4253
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › multi-task optimization
gradient alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient Aligned Regression via Pairwise Losses · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
regression loss design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Gradient Aligned Regression via Pairwise Losses · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pairwise regularization · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Gradient Aligned Regression via Pairwise LossesabstractRegression is a fundamental task in machine learning that has garnered extensive attention over the past decades. The conventional approach for regression involves employing loss functions that primarily concentrate on aligning model prediction with the ground truth for each individual data sample. Recent research endeavors have introduced novel perspectives by incorporating label similarity into regression through the imposition of additional pairwise regularization or contrastive learning on the latent feature space, demonstrating their effectiveness. However, there are two drawbacks to these approaches: (i) their pairwise operations in the latent feature space are computationally more expensive than conventional regression losses; (ii) they lack theoretical insights behind these methods. In this work, we propose GAR (Gradient Aligned Regression) as a competitive alternative method in label space, which is constituted by a conventional regression loss and two pairwise label difference losses for gradient alignment including magnitude and direction. GAR enjoys: i) the same level efficiency as conventional regression loss because the quadratic complexity for the proposed pairwise losses can be reduced to linear complexity; ii) theoretical insights from learning the pairwise label difference to learning the gradient of the ground truth function. We limit our current scope as regression on the clean data setting without noises, outliers or distributional shifts, etc. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method practically on two synthetic datasets and on eight extensive real-world tasks from six benchmark datasets with other eight competitive baselines. Running time experiments demonstrate the superior efficiency of the proposed GAR compared to existing methods with pairwise regularization or contrastive learning in the latent feature space. Additionally, ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of each component of GAR. The code is open sourced at https://github.com/DixianZhu/GAR. Dixian Zhu, Tianbao Yang, Livnat Jerby |
ICML | 3 |