Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bai Cong
dblp:371/4304
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% Optimization for machine learning · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025 Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
edge of stability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep Networks · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational posterior · 0.9edge of stability analysis · 0.9variational inference · 0.8online newton · 0.8bayesian learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of StabilityabstractVariational Learning (VL) has recently gained popularity for training deep neural networks. Part of its empirical success can be explained by theories such as PAC-Bayes bounds, minimum description length and marginal likelihood, but little has been done to unravel the implicit regularization in play. Here, we analyze the implicit regularization of VL through the Edge of Stability (EoS) framework. EoS has previously been used to show that gradient descent can find flat solutions and we extend this result to show that VL can find even flatter solutions. This result is obtained by controlling the shape of the variational posterior as well as the number of posterior samples used during training. The derivation follows in a similar fashion as in the standard EoS literature for deep learning, by first deriving a result for a quadratic problem and then extending it to deep neural networks. We empirically validate these findings on a wide variety of large networks, such as ResNet and ViT, to find that the theoretical results closely match the empirical ones. Ours is the first work to analyze the EoS dynamics of~VL. Avrajit Ghosh, Bai Cong, Rio Yokota, Saiprasad Ravishankar, Molei Tao, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Thomas Möllenhoff |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Variational Learning is Effective for Large Deep NetworksabstractWe give extensive empirical evidence against the common belief that variational learning is ineffective for large neural networks. We show that an optimizer called Improved Variational Online Newton (IVON) consistently matches or outperforms Adam for training large networks such as GPT-2 and ResNets from scratch. IVON's computational costs are nearly identical to Adam but its predictive uncertainty is better. We show several new use cases of IVON where we improve finetuning and model merging in Large Language Models, accurately predict generalization error, and faithfully estimate sensitivity to data. We find overwhelming evidence that variational learning is effective. Code is available at https://github.com/team-approx-bayes/ivon. Yuesong Shen, Nico Daheim, Bai Cong, Peter Nickl, Gian Maria Marconi, Clement Bazan, Rio Yokota, Iryna Gurevych, Daniel Cremers, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Thomas Möllenhoff |
ICML | 3 |