Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dessi P. Zaharieva
dblp:371/4357
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural ODE · 1.5hybrid mechanistic-neural modeling · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic ResponseabstractHybrid models composing mechanistic ODE-based dynamics with flexible and expressive neural network components have grown rapidly in popularity, especially in scientific domains where such ODE-based modeling offers important interpretability and validated causal grounding (e.g., for counterfactual reasoning). The incorporation of mechanistic models also provides inductive bias in standard blackbox modeling approaches, critical when learning from small datasets or partially observed, complex systems. Unfortunately, as the hybrid models become more flexible, the causal grounding provided by the mechanistic model can quickly be lost. We address this problem by leveraging another common source of domain knowledge: ranking of treatment effects for a set of interventions, even if the precise treatment effect is unknown. We encode this information in a causal loss that we combine with the standard predictive loss to arrive at a hybrid loss that biases our learning towards causally valid hybrid models. We demonstrate our ability to achieve a win-win, state-of-the-art predictive performance and causal validity, in the challenging task of modeling glucose dynamics post-exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Bob Junyi Zou, Matthew E. Levine, Dessi P. Zaharieva, Ramesh Johari, Emily B. Fox |
ICML | 3 |