Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dessi P. Zaharieva

dblp:371/4357 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 67% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.812024
Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal model
0.812024
Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
counterfactual reasoning
0.812024
Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural ODE · 1.5hybrid mechanistic-neural modeling · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Response
abstract
Hybrid models composing mechanistic ODE-based dynamics with flexible and expressive neural network components have grown rapidly in popularity, especially in scientific domains where such ODE-based modeling offers important interpretability and validated causal grounding (e.g., for counterfactual reasoning). The incorporation of mechanistic models also provides inductive bias in standard blackbox modeling approaches, critical when learning from small datasets or partially observed, complex systems. Unfortunately, as the hybrid models become more flexible, the causal grounding provided by the mechanistic model can quickly be lost. We address this problem by leveraging another common source of domain knowledge: ranking of treatment effects for a set of interventions, even if the precise treatment effect is unknown. We encode this information in a causal loss that we combine with the standard predictive loss to arrive at a hybrid loss that biases our learning towards causally valid hybrid models. We demonstrate our ability to achieve a win-win, state-of-the-art predictive performance and causal validity, in the challenging task of modeling glucose dynamics post-exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes.
Bob Junyi Zou, Matthew E. Levine, Dessi P. Zaharieva, Ramesh Johari, Emily B. Fox
ICML3