Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William Réveillard
dblp:371/4405
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Approximation and online algorithms · 79% Algorithms and data structures · 21% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
regret lower bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace Recovery · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › structured bandit
low-rank bandits |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace Recovery · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace Recovery · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures
spectral methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace Recovery · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret lower bound · 1.7asymptotically optimal algorithm · 1.7spectral methods · 1.5singular subspace recovery · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal AlgorithmsabstractWe consider a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem with i.i.d. rewards where the expected reward function is multimodal with at most $m$ modes. We propose the first known computationally tractable algorithm for computing the solution to the Graves-Lai optimization problem, which in turn enables the implementation of asymptotically optimal algorithms for this bandit problem. William Réveillard, Richard Combes |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Low-Rank Bandits via Tight Two-to-Infinity Singular Subspace RecoveryabstractWe study contextual bandits with low-rank structure where, in each round, if the (context, arm) pair $(i,j)\in [m]\times [n]$ is selected, the learner observes a noisy sample of the $(i,j)$-th entry of an unknown low-rank reward matrix. Successive contexts are generated randomly in an i.i.d. manner and are revealed to the learner. For such bandits, we present efficient algorithms for policy evaluation, best policy identification and regret minimization. For policy evaluation and best policy identification, we show that our algorithms are nearly minimax optimal. For instance, the number of samples required to return an $\varepsilon$-optimal policy with probability at least $1-\delta$ typically scales as $\frac{m+n}{\varepsilon^2}\log(1/\delta)$. Our regret minimization algorithm enjoys minimax guarantees typically scaling as $r^{5/4}(m+n)^{3/4}\sqrt{T}$, which improves over existing algorithms. All the proposed algorithms consist of two phases: they first leverage spectral methods to estimate the left and right singular subspaces of the low-rank reward matrix. We show that these estimates enjoy tight error guarantees in the two-to-infinity norm. This in turn allows us to reformulate our problems as a misspecified linear bandit problem with dimension roughly $r(m+n)$ and misspecification controlled by the subspace recovery error, as well as to design the second phase of our algorithms efficiently. Yassir Jedra, William Réveillard, Stefan Stojanovic, Alexandre Proutière |
ICML | 2 |