Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robin Yadav

dblp:371/4947 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 41% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Optimization for machine learning · 18%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% Computational science and engineering · 50%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
discrete flow matching
0.912025
RETRO SYNFLOW: Discrete Flow-Matching for Accurate and Diverse Single-Step Retrosynthesis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › continuous-time generative model
markov bridge
0.912025
RETRO SYNFLOW: Discrete Flow-Matching for Accurate and Diverse Single-Step Retrosynthesis · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecule generation
0.912025
RETRO SYNFLOW: Discrete Flow-Matching for Accurate and Diverse Single-Step Retrosynthesis · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry
retrosynthesis prediction
0.912025
RETRO SYNFLOW: Discrete Flow-Matching for Accurate and Diverse Single-Step Retrosynthesis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization
0.812024
Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.812024
Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training optimization
0.812024
Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
optimization dynamics
0.212024
Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential monte carlo · 1.7reaction center identification · 1.7feynman-kac steering · 1.7discrete flow matching · 1.7gradient-hessian correlation analysis · 0.8convergence analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Local Curvature Descent: Squeezing More Curvature out of Standard and Polyak Gradient Descent
abstract
We contribute to the growing body of knowledge on more powerful and adaptive stepsizes for convex optimization, empowered by local curvature information. We do not go the route of fully-fledged second-order methods, which require the expensive computation of the Hessian. Instead, our key observation is that, for some problems (e.g., when minimizing the sum of squares of absolutely convex functions), local curvature information is readily available, and can be used to obtain surprisingly powerful matrix-valued stepsizes, and meaningful theory. In particular, we develop three new methods — LCD1, LCD2, and LCD3 — where the abbreviation stands for local curvature descent. While LCD1 generalizes gradient descent with fixed stepsize, LCD2 generalizes gradient descent with Polyak stepsize. Our methods enhance these classical gradient descent baselines with local curvature information, and our theory recovers the known rates in the special case when no curvature information is used. Our last method, LCD3, is a variable-metric version of LCD2; this feature leads to a closed-form expression for the iterates. Our empirical results are encouraging and show that the local curvature descent improves upon gradient descent.
Peter Richtárik, Simone Maria Giancola, Dymitr Lubczyk, Robin Yadav
NeurIPS4
2025 RETRO SYNFLOW: Discrete Flow-Matching for Accurate and Diverse Single-Step Retrosynthesis
abstract
A fundamental challenge in organic chemistry is identifying and predicting the sequence of reactions that synthesize a desired target molecule. Due to the combinatorial nature of the chemical search space, single-step reactant prediction—i.e., single-step retrosynthesis—remains difficult, even for state-of-the-art template-free generative methods. These models often struggle to produce an accurate yet diverse set of feasible reactions in a chemically rational manner. In this paper, we propose RETRO SYNFLOW (RSF), a discrete flow-matching framework that formulates single-step retrosynthesis as a Markov bridge between a given product molecule and its corresponding reactants. Unlike prior approaches, RSF introduces a reaction center identification step to extract intermediate structures, or synthons, which serve as a more informative and structured source distribution for the discrete flow model. To further improve the diversity and chemical feasibility of generated samples, RSF incorporates Feynman-Kac (FK) steering with Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) resampling at inference time. This approach leverages a learned forward-synthesis reward oracle to guide the generation process toward more promising reactant candidates. Empirically, RSF substantially outperforms the previous state-of-the-art methods in top-1 accuracy. In addition, FK-steering significantly improves round-trip accuracy, demonstrating stronger chemical validity and synthetic feasibility, all while maintaining competitive top-k performance. These results establish RSF as a new leading approach for single-step retrosynthesis prediction.
Robin Yadav, Guy Wolf, Joey Bose, Renjie Liao 0001
NeurIPS1
2024 Heavy-Tailed Class Imbalance and Why Adam Outperforms Gradient Descent on Language Models
abstract
Adam has been shown to outperform gradient descent on large language models by a larger margin than on other tasks, but it is unclear why. We show that a key factor in this performance gap is the heavy-tailed class imbalance found in language tasks. When trained with gradient descent, the loss of infrequent words decreases more slowly than the loss of frequent ones. This leads to a slow decrease on the average loss as most samples come from infrequent words. On the other hand, Adam and sign-based methods are less sensitive to this problem. To establish that this behavior is caused by class imbalance, we show empirically that it can be reproduced across architectures and data types, on language transformers, vision CNNs, and linear models. On a linear model with cross-entropy loss, we show that class imbalance leads to imbalanced, correlated gradients and Hessians that have been hypothesized to benefit Adam. We also prove that, in continuous time, gradient descent converges slowly on low-frequency classes while sign descent does not.
Frederik Kunstner, Alan Milligan, Robin Yadav, Mark Schmidt 0001, Alberto Bietti
NeurIPS3