Giulia Volpi

dblp:371/5615 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree learning
0.812024
Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent generative model
0.812024
Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
optimal decision tree
0.812024
Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › logic-based explanation › rule-based explanation
decision tree explanation
0.212024
Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.212024
Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 0.8genetic algorithm · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Generative Model for Decision Trees
abstract
Decision trees are among the most popular supervised models due to their interpretability and knowledge representation resembling human reasoning. Commonly-used decision tree induction algorithms are based on greedy top-down strategies. Although these approaches are known to be an efficient heuristic, the resulting trees are only locally optimal and tend to have overly complex structures. On the other hand, optimal decision tree algorithms attempt to create an entire decision tree at once to achieve global optimality. We place our proposal between these approaches by designing a generative model for decision trees. Our method first learns a latent decision tree space through a variational architecture using pre-trained decision tree models. Then, it adopts a genetic procedure to explore such latent space to find a compact decision tree with good predictive performance. We compare our proposal against classical tree induction methods, optimal approaches, and ensemble models. The results show that our proposal can generate accurate and shallow, i.e., interpretable, decision trees.
Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Mattia Setzu, Giulia Volpi
AAAI4