EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Giulia Volpi
dblp:371/5615
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 28% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent generative model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
optimal decision tree |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › logic-based explanation › rule-based explanation
decision tree explanation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Model for Decision Trees · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.8genetic algorithm · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Generative Model for Decision TreesabstractDecision trees are among the most popular supervised models due to their interpretability and knowledge representation resembling human reasoning. Commonly-used decision tree induction algorithms are based on greedy top-down strategies. Although these approaches are known to be an efficient heuristic, the resulting trees are only locally optimal and tend to have overly complex structures. On the other hand, optimal decision tree algorithms attempt to create an entire decision tree at once to achieve global optimality. We place our proposal between these approaches by designing a generative model for decision trees. Our method first learns a latent decision tree space through a variational architecture using pre-trained decision tree models. Then, it adopts a genetic procedure to explore such latent space to find a compact decision tree with good predictive performance. We compare our proposal against classical tree induction methods, optimal approaches, and ensemble models. The results show that our proposal can generate accurate and shallow, i.e., interpretable, decision trees. Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, Mattia Setzu, Giulia Volpi |
AAAI | 4 |