Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohan Tang
dblp:371/8476
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% Question answering and dialogue systems · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
contrastive data augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
image augmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DACO: Towards Application-Driven and Comprehensive Data Analysis via Code Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
table question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DACO: Towards Application-Driven and Comprehensive Data Analysis via Code Generation · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 1.5reinforcement learning from human feedback · 1.5code generation · 1.5synthetic data filtering · 0.9multimodal generative model · 0.9contrastive feature extraction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Enhancing Infrared Spectroscopy Analysis Based on Data Augmentation and Deep Learning
Mohan Tang, Wei She |
ICIC (12) | 1 |
| 2025 | Contrastive Visual Data AugmentationabstractLarge multimodal models (LMMs) often struggle to recognize novel concepts, as they rely on pre-trained knowledge and have limited ability to capture subtle visual details. Domain-specific knowledge gaps in training also make them prone to confusing visually similar, commonly misrepresented, or low-resource concepts. To help LMMs better align nuanced visual features with language, improving their ability to recognize and reason about novel or rare concepts, we propose a Contrastive visual Data Augmentation (CoDA) strategy. CoDA extracts key contrastive textual and visual features of target concepts against the known concepts they are misrecognized as, and then uses multimodal generative models to produce targeted synthetic data. Automatic filtering of extracted features and augmented images is implemented to guarantee their quality, as verified by human annotators. We show the effectiveness and efficiency of CoDA on low-resource concept and diverse scene recognition datasets including INaturalist and SUN. We additionally collect NovelSpecies, a benchmark dataset consisting of newly discovered animal species that are guaranteed to be unseen by LMMs. LLaVA-1.6 1-shot updating results on these three datasets show CoDA significantly improves SOTA visual data augmentation strategies by 12.3% (NovelSpecies), 5.1% (SUN), and 6.0% (iNat) absolute gains in accuracy. Yu Zhou 0030, Mohan Tang, Xiaomeng Jin, Te-Lin Wu, Kuan-Hao Huang, Heng Ji 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2024 | DACO: Towards Application-Driven and Comprehensive Data Analysis via Code GenerationabstractData analysis is a crucial analytical process essential for deriving insights from real-world databases. As shown in Figure 1, the need for data analysis typically arises from specific application scenarios, and requires diverse reasoning skills including mathematical reasoning, logical reasoning, and strategic reasoning. Existing work often focus on simple factual retrieval or arithmetic resolutions and thus are insufficient for addressing complex real-world queries. This work aims to propose new resources and benchmarks on this crucial yet challenging and under-explored task. Due to the prohibitively high cost of collecting expert annotations, we use large language models (LLMs) enhanced by code generation to automatically generate high-quality data analysis, which will later be refined by human annotators. We construct the DACO dataset, containing (1) 440 databases (of tabular data) collected from real-world scenarios, (2) ~2k automatically generated query-answer pairs that can serve as weak supervision for model training, and (3) a concentrated but high-quality test set with human refined annotations that serves as our main evaluation benchmark. Experiments show that while LLMs like GPT-4 exhibit promising data analysis capabilities, they are still evaluated as less helpful than human-written analysis on 58.1% cases. Leveraging our weak supervision data, we experiment with various fine-tuning methods, including supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Our trained model outperforms existing baselines for table question answering, and RLHF further boosts the helpfulness of generated analysis on 58.5% cases.Data and code are released at https://github.com/shirley-wu/daco. Xueqing Wu 0001, Jingzhen Sha, Te-Lin Wu, Hanyu Zhou, Mohan Tang, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Nanyun Peng 0001, Haoran Huang |
NeurIPS | 6 |