Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Klas Wijk
dblp:371/9391
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 41% Representation and self-supervised learning · 35% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SFESS: Score Function Estimators for k-Subset Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient estimation
score function estimator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SFESS: Score Function Estimators for k-Subset Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › autoencoder
concrete autoencoder |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indirectly Parameterized Concrete Autoencoders · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › feature selection
embedded feature selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indirectly Parameterized Concrete Autoencoders · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Indirectly Parameterized Concrete Autoencoders · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SFESS: Score Function Estimators for k-Subset Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score function estimator · 0.9discrete fourier transform · 0.9control variates · 0.9gumbel-softmax · 0.8autoencoder · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SFESS: Score Function Estimators for k-Subset SamplingabstractAre score function estimators a viable approach to learning with $k$-subset sampling? Sampling $k$-subsets is a fundamental operation that is not amenable to differentiable parametrization, impeding gradient-based optimization. Previous work has favored approximate pathwise gradients or relaxed sampling, dismissing score function estimators because of their high variance. Inspired by the success of score function estimators in variational inference and reinforcement learning, we revisit them for $k$-subset sampling. We demonstrate how to efficiently compute the distribution's score function using a discrete Fourier transform and reduce the estimator's variance with control variates. The resulting estimator provides both $k$-hot samples and unbiased gradient estimates while being applicable to non-differentiable downstream models, unlike existing methods. We validate our approach experimentally and find that it produces results comparable to those of recent state-of-the-art pathwise gradient estimators across a range of tasks. Klas Wijk, Ricardo Vinuesa, Hossein Azizpour |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Indirectly Parameterized Concrete AutoencodersabstractFeature selection is a crucial task in settings where data is high-dimensional or acquiring the full set of features is costly. Recent developments in neural network-based embedded feature selection show promising results across a wide range of applications. Concrete Autoencoders (CAEs), considered state-of-the-art in embedded feature selection, may struggle to achieve stable joint optimization, hurting their training time and generalization. In this work, we identify that this instability is correlated with the CAE learning duplicate selections. To remedy this, we propose a simple and effective improvement: Indirectly Parameterized CAEs (IP-CAEs). IP-CAEs learn an embedding and a mapping from it to the Gumbel-Softmax distributions’ parameters. Despite being simple to implement, IP-CAE exhibits significant and consistent improvements over CAE in both generalization and training time across several datasets for reconstruction and classification. Unlike CAE, IP-CAE effectively leverages non-linear relationships and does not require retraining the jointly optimized decoder. Furthermore, our approach is, in principle, generalizable to Gumbel-Softmax distributions beyond feature selection. Alfred Nilsson, Klas Wijk, Sai Bharath Chandra Gutha, Erik Englesson, Alexandra Hotti, Carlo Saccardi, Oskar Kviman, Jens Lagergren, Ricardo Vinuesa, Hossein Azizpour |
ICML | 2 |