Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Haojie Xin

dblp:372/0642 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-5223-0113ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 45% Vision and language · 15% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
jailbreak defense
1.012026
SafetyReminder: Reviving Delayed Safety Awareness of Vision-Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
SafetyReminder: Reviving Delayed Safety Awareness of Vision-Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
1.012026
SafetyReminder: Reviving Delayed Safety Awareness of Vision-Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › generative model safety
vision-language model safety
1.012026
SafetyReminder: Reviving Delayed Safety Awareness of Vision-Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › learning for planning
imitation-based planning
0.912025
Causal Contrastive Learning with Data Augmentations for Imitation-Based Planning · ICRA 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.912025
Causal Contrastive Learning with Data Augmentations for Imitation-Based Planning · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.912025
Causal Contrastive Learning with Data Augmentations for Imitation-Based Planning · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft prompt tuning · 1.0prompt tuning · 1.0shortcut eliminator · 0.9counterfactual data augmentation · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SafetyReminder: Reviving Delayed Safety Awareness of Vision-Language Models to Defend Against Jailbreak Attacks
abstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) extend Large Language Models (LLMs) with visual perception capabilities, unlocking broad applications across many domains. However, ensuring their safety remains a critical challenge, as adversarial visual inputs can easily bypass built-in safeguards and elicit harmful content. In this paper, we uncover a phenomenon we call delayed safety awareness, where a jailbroken VLM initially produces harmful content but ultimately recognizes the harmfulness at the end of the generation process. We attribute this phenomenon to the fact that the model's safety awareness against jailbreaks cannot be effectively transferred to the intermediate stages of text generation. Motivated by this insight, we introduce SafetyReminder, a simple yet effective defense that optimizes a learnable soft prompt using our proposed Safety-Activation Prompt Tuning (SAPT). This soft prompt is inserted into the generated text to activate the safety awareness of the model, steering it toward refusal when harmful content arises while preserving helpfulness in benign scenarios. We evaluate our method on three established harmful benchmarks and across three types of adversarial attacks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art defense performance with strong generalization, offering a practical and lightweight solution for safe deployment of VLMs.
Peiyuan Tang, Haojie Xin, Xiaodong Zhang 0014, Jun Sun 0001, Qin Xia, Zijiang Yang 0006
AAAI2
2025 Domain Connection based Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
abstract
Collecting and annotating data for semantic segmentation can end up costing a lot of time and energy. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) for semantic segmentation allows models trained on certain source domain data (such as the GTA synthetic dataset) to be applied to certain target data (like the Cityscapes real dataset), significantly decreasing the requirement for target-domain manual pixel-level annotations.In this paper, we suggest a cross-domain unified semantic segmentation network training framework, the Attention Distribution Adaptation Network (ADAN). It (1) proposes the Content Consistency Transformation (CCT), which maps source domain data to an intermediate domain that has a data distribution that is comparable to that of the target domain, and (2) introduces the Attention Adaptation Module (AAM), which bolsters the synchronization of attention between the intermediate domain and the target domain. ADAN achieved unprecedented mIoUs of 77.2 and 68.8 on GTA→Cityscapes and Synthia→Cityscapes, respectively, corresponding to improvements of +1.3 and +0.6 over the state of the art.
Chunze Yang, Xiaodong Zhang 0036, Peiyuan Tang, Haoran Yuan, Haojie Xin, Zijiang Yang 0006
ICASSP5
2025 Causal Contrastive Learning with Data Augmentations for Imitation-Based Planning
abstract
Motion planning is a difficult task, especially when generating feasible future trajectories in complex and interactive scenarios. While recent advancements in imitation-based planning have shown significant progress, this approach often encounters causal confusion in dynamic traffic environments. This confusion will cause the planner to incorrectly associate certain actions with outcomes, leading to suboptimal or unsafe plans. To address this, we introduce a novel framework called$\overline{C}^{2}L$, which improves the planner's latent Causal understanding by incorporating Contrastive Learning and counterfactual data augmentation. Additionally, we propose a shortcut eliminator to extract copycat-free features from history states, reducing the impact of temporal spurious correlations. We validate our method on the nuPlan and interPlan benchmarks, with extensive experiments demonstrating that$C^{2}L$delivers highly competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Haojie Xin, Xiaodong Zhang 0036, Songyang Yan, Jun Sun 0001, Zijiang Yang 0006
ICRA1